i am reminded that if “social media” didn’t devolve we’d have organized and come together to solve (crisis upon crisis) already and politicians would’ve had a digital polling station and direct communication with the populace.

instead Facebook Twitter YouTube is what it is.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I don’t think I understand the question.

    The Internet isn’t supposed to have a “center”, at all. If it ever does, something has gone wrong.

    Federation, like what we’re doing here, can make it so that everyone’s personal “center” can be whatever platform they choose to use most of the time. Someone trying to communicate may be using an entirely different one, it will still get federated to whatever you prefer.

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The Olive Garden app, cause when you are on it, you are family.

    But no, I disagree that we’d have all come together and just solved everything with a different “central” app. Though I guess a government version of Twitter where everyone gets a login and every company has to have a support arm for making announcements and allowing the government to make them too would be helpful like it was and still sometimes is.

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I like this idea. I wouldn’t use .gov twitter, but I support it being made.

      I’ve also said for years that the post office should be offering official government backed email addresses to people that have the same rules as federal mail (like anti tampering laws). You get one, it’s for official shit only, and it’s illegal for anyone else to open your mail without your permission.

  • heluecht@pirati.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    @bluemoon Pertube and Friendica are rather complicated tools. So I guess that tools with fewer options are more mainstream compatible. But seeing that people in general tend to use photo/video oriented platforms (Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, …), I guess that tools like Pixelfed and Loops would be more in the focus.

    • rozodru@pie.andmc.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Pixelfed is easier to use so you’re right.

      Peertube is fine but trying to find good content or a good instance is a struggle still. Frendica i’ve signed up for but really haven’t used (in fact I think the instance I signed up on is dead).

      I mean I even run my own peertube instance and I barely use it because I just can’t find anything good to watch on it other than a couple tech channels that update once in a blue moon.

        • rozodru@pie.andmc.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I have used fedi.video and add/follow various instances I find to mine but I’m not sure if I don’t have my peertube configured correctly or what but it’s not pulling up anything decent.

    • heluecht@pirati.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      @iloveDigit Nostr’s unique features are their biggest enemy as well. To be completely uncensorable sounds nice, but on the same side open all floodgates for spam, massive harassment towards some groups of people or individuals and also content that is considered illegal in most countries (like child porn).

      It may work in a rather small bubble, but will never work on a large scale.

      • whoever loves Digit@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Then you’re really saying the internet is dying faster than it can develop. I think that’s just psychologically defensive defeatism, tied to stuff like saying humans can’t survive climate change

        • jansk@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          What on Earth? Where did they say anything remotely like what you describe?

          If by your definition the internet is “dead” if it can’t be full of unmoderated spam, racism/bigotry and astroturfing then I’ll cheer the death of your “internet”

          • whoever loves Digit@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            If humans can avoid extinction and keep the internet online for a long enough time, it shouldn’t be too hard for them to eventually figure out censorship is bad

            • TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Intentional community building isnt censorship, and a lack of moderation isnt intentional community building. It’s a cesspool with no drain.

              • whoever loves Digit@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                What does that have to do with the context where you’re replying? I was talking about censorship, not community building / spam filtering

                • TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  The “censorship” you’re referring to is what real online communities commonly refer to as moderation. Moderation is a direct form of influencing or “building” community in online spaces. Unmoderated (or uncensored as you put it) online spaces always necessarily become filled with bigotry, slurs, and Nazis.

                  That’s the conversation we’re having with you, even though you seem to want to talk about the same subject in a manner that doesnt match with reality.