• SoloCritical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This is a scene from a movie called “The Mist” where in this photo, he and his family are on the run from monsters in the mist, they finally got a car and hit the road to escape, the never did get out of the mist… the car runs out of gas and they sit there quietly in the mist… they hear something approaching and the man, knowing damn well what was coming, looks at his wife as to say “sorry, I love you” before he shoots his wife and kids… out of bullets he gets out of the vehicle only to discover the military is marching down the street clearing the mist.

  • PhilMcGraw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    20 hours ago

    This broke my brain, I identified it as “The Mist” but I was 100% sure Mark Wahlberg was the main character so I was trying to work out what the joke was/why Wahlberg was replaced.

    Guess I have my own Berenstein Bears thing going on.

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      you are confusing the Mist with The Happening. which starred Mark Wahlberg.

      they were vaguely similar. While the Mist was a lovecraftian horror story about a heavy fog taking over a region with unearthly horrors prowling the area after a tear in reality or something occured at a Military research facility,

      the Happening was a bit more hacky. it was about Plants releasing a neurotoxin that made humans off themselves.

    • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I genuinely liked the movie, but hated the ending enough that it was years before I watched it again.

      Anyone who hasn’t, go read the book. The ending is soooo much better and really had me hoping King would explore that whole world more… Easily one of my top five stories of his.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        67
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The changed ending for the film is a fucking masterpiece. Even King says it, and he’s famously bitchy about filmmakers changing his storylines.

        • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          I strongly disagree… It was deus ex machina trash with a twist. Using the original ending would have left the audience wanting closure and not getting it. Instead, they wrapped it up nice and tight and King got to murder another kid.

          • Soupbreaker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            I completely agree with you. I’ve left very similar comments whenever this movie’s come up in the past, and someone always shows up to say “Even King agrees the movie ending’s better!” Well, it’s bullshit.

            • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Right? King, who’s endorsed and even appeared in some of the worst adaptations of his books. He’s truly a master, but a movie writer he is not…

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The book ending is super lazy. The “I was actually writing this story this whole time and now I’m leaving it here for someone to find” trope was used sooo many times before (“Handmade’s tale” to name one). Movie ending was at least original.

        • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          15 hours ago

          For reference: handmaids tail was published in 1985, the mist was published in 1980. There are probably examples of that trope prior to the mist, but the handmaids tale isn’t one.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          The Handmaid’s Tale (it’s kinda funny how both you and a commenter replying to you misspell the name in two different ways) is going for a “The Lady or the Tiger” ending. Do you believe that Nick is actually part of the Resistance, or is he part of the state secret police? The narrative tricked us a little with the “relationship” between Offred and the Commander - can we trust anyone at all?

          The epilogue also gives the narrative some verisimilitude. It’s pretending to be a historical document - how would the world post-Gilead react to accounts of what happened to women during Gilead? How would you interact with the Diary of Anne Frank if you didn’t know that she was killed in the camps?

          I fail to see how it’s similar to “The Mist” here.

          • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            If I remember correctly “The Mist” also ends by pretending it was a “historical document”. That’s the similarity I was referring to. In my opinion it’s a bit silly. Are we really to believe someone had time to write entire book while running for their lives? With dialogs and detailed description of all events? It’s also totally unnecessary. You can have an open ending without pretending it’s a historic document. It’s also crazy old. Don Quijote does he same thing, pretending it’s actually a real story being translated from old, Arabic sources. It doesn’t mean the books are bad. It just a trope ending.

      • shalafi@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Maybe the first time I read a comment disliking the movie ending! Yeah, the story leaves the ending open, maybe scarier? But the movie ending is a sledgehammer to the face.

        Either way, can we agree the religious-nut lady was one of the most hateful characters of all time? I’d have shot her just to keep the situation from spiraling out of control any further. Seriously! You’re in a fight for your very survival and this bitch is riling up the crowd, the very people you need to work with so you all survive, and against your child?!

        • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          I can totally agree with that. I found her to be one of the most humanly believable villains in any story I’ve seen or read. She’d fit in to so many real world situations as that exact person. Absolutely the kind of nut job you’d see having a meltdown tantrum as someone recorded her on their phone.

    • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      99
      ·
      1 day ago

      Screen grab from the final scene of The Mist (2007).

      Tap for spoiler

      The father in the driver seat shoots everybody else in the car as an act of mercy to save them from a certain death by the monsters in the movie. Goes to turn the gun on himself only to be met with an empty chamber. Mere moments later, military vehicles emerge from the mist to take on the monsters. If he had waited legitimately 2 more minutes everybody in the car would have been saved.

    • finitebanjo@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The move “The Mist” which ends with uh…

      a questionable choice of action taken by an entire family immediately revealed to be incorrect before the credits roll.

      • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        1 day ago

        My favourite bit of trivia from that movie was that Stephen King watched it and was furious by the ending because he wished he’d thought of such a grim ending when he wrote the book.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          That seems to happen to a lot of adaptations of his work. I think he may have even admitted that he’s not great at ending what he starts.

          • shalafi@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 day ago

            He’s my favorite author, up there with Pratchett anyway, and yes he’s said that. He doesn’t plan anything, just sits down and starts hammering it out. He’s so engrossed in writing the tale, he doesn’t want it to end, doesn’t plan that part.

            • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              21 hours ago

              It’s in the end of the last Dark Tower book. What he wrote can be reworded as ‘Do you have sex only for the orgasm alone, or for the whole process of it?’. And it wasn’t the weirdest part of said series.

        • finitebanjo@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yeah Stephen King probably wrote some ending about having to sacrifice a child and then it showing up before the credits as a ghost with the other dead children in a dreamworld. I have no idea, just guessing.

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            He left the ending ambiguous for the reader to imagine what happens. He missed out on twisting the knife.

    • TheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago
      Tap for spoiler

      I just watched an edited version of the ending video on YouTube. Basically this family is trapped in a supermarket and terrified of a giant kaiju-type bug attack going on.

      The story revolves around the groups of people at the store trying to survive.

      Immediately after this screenshot in the meme, the father kills his entire family, leaves the car, and sees a MASSIVE caravan of military personnel escorting survivors out of the titular mist and using flamethrowers to burn away the bugs and mist.

      Most of the folks from the supermarket are seen in these trucks.

    • cRazi_man@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      The Mist

      A Stephen King movie from 2007. It’s worth a watch. You can find YouTube videos about the ending, but it’s obviously going to spoil the movie if you’re planning to watch it.

  • JackLSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Forgot all about this! Nearly passed out from how hard I was laughing at that ending

  • MissJinx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I had read the tale long before the movie and was very pissed with the ending. The whole movie is shit but the ending changed everything. That was Fucked up