kopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 days agoruleskymedia.d.on-t.workexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1135arrow-down134
arrow-up1101arrow-down1external-linkruleskymedia.d.on-t.workkopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 days agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squarekrimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·3 days agohow do they make money? there’s no ads and it’s free
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoPhase one enshittification. They’re burning VC money to acquire users, who they will then betray.
minus-squaremorphballganon@mtgzone.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·17 hours agoSo, baseless speculation?
minus-squaregfle@szmer.infolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 hours agoI’d rather say that it’s “learning from history of similar services”. Facebook also seemed nice in the beginning.
minus-squareTriflingToad@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 days agoYouTube was like that too
minus-squarekrimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoeven if they suddenly put ads on it (which would be stupid since no ads is one of their main selling points) it’d still be better than twitter/threads
how do they make money? there’s no ads and it’s free
Phase one enshittification. They’re burning VC money to acquire users, who they will then betray.
So, baseless speculation?
I’d rather say that it’s “learning from history of similar services”. Facebook also seemed nice in the beginning.
YouTube was like that too
even if they suddenly put ads on it (which would be stupid since no ads is one of their main selling points) it’d still be better than twitter/threads
for now