kopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 年前ruleskymedia.d.on-t.workexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1136arrow-down134
arrow-up1102arrow-down1external-linkruleskymedia.d.on-t.workkopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 年前message-square25fedilink
minus-squarekayden@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·1 年前how do they make money? there’s no ads and it’s free
minus-squareTriflingToad@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 年前YouTube was like that too
minus-squarekayden@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前even if they suddenly put ads on it (which would be stupid since no ads is one of their main selling points) it’d still be better than twitter/threads
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 年前Phase one enshittification. They’re burning VC money to acquire users, who they will then betray.
minus-squaremorphballganon@mtgzone.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 年前So, baseless speculation?
minus-squaregfle@szmer.infolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 年前I’d rather say that it’s “learning from history of similar services”. Facebook also seemed nice in the beginning.
how do they make money? there’s no ads and it’s free
YouTube was like that too
even if they suddenly put ads on it (which would be stupid since no ads is one of their main selling points) it’d still be better than twitter/threads
for now
Phase one enshittification. They’re burning VC money to acquire users, who they will then betray.
So, baseless speculation?
I’d rather say that it’s “learning from history of similar services”. Facebook also seemed nice in the beginning.