• kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Pirating Windows for your own personal, private use, which will never directly make you a single dollar: HIGHLY ILLEGAL

    Scraping your creative works so they can make billions by selling automated processes that compete against your work: Perfectly fine and normal!

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Do people still pirate Windows? You can download the iso directly from Microsoft’s website and you don’t need a registration key anymore.

  • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sure bud, pirating some Microsoft Studio video games and windows ISOs right now. What? I found them on the open web!

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      “Copying is theft” is the argument of corporations for ages, but if they want our data and information, to integrate into their business, then, suddenly they have the rights to it.

      If copying is not theft, then we have the rights to copy their software and AI models, as well, since it is available on the open web.

      They got themselves into quite a contradiction.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You realize that half of Lemmy is tying themselves in inconsistent logical knots trying to escape the reverse conundrum?

        Copying isn’t stealing and never was. Our IP system that artificially restricts information has never made sense in the digital age, and yet now everyone is on here cheering copyright on.

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Copyright infrigment is not theft, training models is not copyright infringement either. We need a law equivalent to when an artist says “he’s inpired by someone else” . That it specifically is illegal to do that without permission if you use a machine. That will force big tech to pay a pittance for it and it will instakill all the small player.

    • Elias Griffin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Copyright Infringment strawman argument. When considering AI, we are not talking legal copyright infringement in the relationship between humans vs AI. Humans are mostly concerned with being obsoleted by Big Tech so the real issue is Intellectual Property Theft.

      artificial INTELLIGENCE stole our Intellectual Property

      Do you see it now?

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s only theft as long as you cling to the failed “copyright” model.

        Big tech couldn’t steal anything if we don’t respect their property rights in the first place.

        By reifying copyright under the AI paradigm, we maintain big tech’s power over us.

        The truth is chatgpt belong to us. ClosedAI is just the compiler of the data.

        If we finally end the failed experiment of copyright, we destroy their mote.