• 6 Posts
  • 1.67K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle



  • Why is it rong to forgive the one you love ?

    Whoever you were unfaithful with probably hadn’t promised your boyfriend anything, so definitely it’s irrational to blame “the other guy”.
    If you had agreed to be in a monogamous relationship, you broke that agreement, and for most people that’s a very serious thing.
    I do not however buy into your claim that this issue is something men care about more than woman. On the contrary women are generally the ones complaining about potentially unfaithful men, and I’ve heard many women generalize that men are often unfaithful, to a degree one would think that is much more common. But statistics clearly indicate that since there are more men than women, chances are that on average, women are more frequently unfaithful than men.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeonhole_principle


  • it doesn’t know or understand

    But that’s not what intelligence is, that’s what consciousness is.
    Intelligence is not understanding shit, it’s the ability to for instance solve a problem, so a frigging calculator has a tiny degree of intelligence, but not enough for us to call it AI.
    There is simply zero doubt an AI is intelligent, claiming otherwise just shows people don’t know the difference between intelligence and consciousness.

    Passing an exam is a form of intelligence.
    Can a good AI pass a basic exam?
    YES.
    Does passing an exam require consciousness?
    NO.
    Because an exam tests abilities of intelligence, not level of consciousness.

    it can only guess at the next statistically most likely piece of information based on the data that has been fed into it. That’s not intelligence.

    Except we do the exact same thing! Based on prior experience (learning) we choose what we find to be the most likely answer. And that is indeed intelligence.

    Current AI does not have the reasoning abilities we have yet, but they are not completely without it, and it’s a subject that is currently worked on and improved. So current AI is actually a pretty high form of intelligence. And can sometimes out compete average humans in certain areas.







  • Both Aarhus and Copenhagen municipalities have decided this, and the ministry of Digitization is pioneering it for government administration. The decision so far primarily regards MS Office and MS cloud services, and MS Windows.
    The minister has even stated that the rollout is to begin already within 3 weeks!
    Also the government has decided to make guidelines to make the switch away from American software and services easier. These guidelines are meant both for public services AND private businesses.

    We haven’t seen any results yet, but at least the political decision seems clear. The goal is to end dependency on American software and services for Denmark. Which is in line with a similar decision earlier this year for EU.



  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldWhen the AI bubble bursts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    I think the difference here is that you can’t quite just put an AI tag on something, and then investors flock to give you money.
    The AI companies that are invested in, are mostly companies that actually have something to show. And the biggest investment and benefactor is Nvidia that actually makes loads of money from AI products.


  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldWhen the AI bubble bursts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    AI is improving at the same rate it always has

    This is blatantly false, there’s a reason there is talk of the cold winter of AI, and the long walk in the desert.
    The desert walk was at least 2 decades of very little progress despite big investments, the cold winter was another decade without much progress because of disillusionment so nobody wanted to invest in it.
    AI has progressed more for the past 10-15 years than it did for 40 years from about the 70’s to about 2010.

    For actual AI, nothing has changed.

    I assume you mean strong or general AI, and that’s not what we are debating here, because that is not a reality yet.

    Something that doesn’t exist obviously can’t burst.


  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldWhen the AI bubble bursts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    I agree 100%, and yes there are always losers due to competition and failure to compete. Just like some companies are losing money making cars, but cars are obviously not a bubble.
    Maybe the most of the hype is over for now among investors, but AFAIK Nvidia who is the biggest supplier of hardware for it, is not seeing a slowdown in demand.
    So maybe it’s more a slow down of interest in the media?


  • No you can’t sous vide at body temperature. red meat needs 60 °C (130 to 140 °F).
    Body temperature is only about 37°.
    Try to warm some water to 60° C and put your finger in it, and see how long you can hold it there.
    Or maybe don’t because you will get burned.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sous_vide

    If your question is how we can tolerate higher temperatures than our body temperature, even up to 60° C, the answer is body cooling. As mentioned by others, cooling by evaporating sweat (water) from the surface of our skin.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_index

    If you look at the table, you can only tolerate up to for instance 43° C at 40% humidity. At that point there is extreme danger.
    The more dry the air is, the higher temperature can be tolerated, because the sweat evaporates faster so you cool faster.

    So at 90% humidity cooling is very slow, so you can only tolerate up to 33° C. Which is about 4° C below body temperature. But the heat you generate internally makes you heat up to above tolerable body temperature, and if prolonged you will die.


  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldWhen the AI bubble bursts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Yes I think Facebook and Microsoft may lose money on this, you could call that over investing, but for it to be a bubble that burst, companies need to go down, and people lose money on it.
    Otherwise you may be looking for a completely different word which is fad, a period where something is over hyped, but quickly settles down like Fidget Spinners.
    .com was a bubble because a lot of people lost a lot of money, so much so that it reverberated through the entirety of financial systems globally. I don’t think we will see a financial bubble burst due to AI, that is more than 1% of that at most.
    META is throwing out money like crazy on their “META” project that will never succeed, and they are doing the same with AI, but they will not go bankrupt on it, and AI will almost guaranteed be more successful than the “META” project.
    What I mean is that generally more money will be made on AI, than is lost experimenting with it.


  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldWhen the AI bubble bursts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I don’t think it will, AI will improve transform and expand in areas of usefulness, so I think we are still in the early days.

    But at what point can we agree that it didn’t?
    When we finally get FSD for real? When AI helps improve diagnosis and saves lives?
    When AI creates new molecules that are better than any chemist could do without AI.

    What will it take for people to realize that AI is here to stay? And AI will remain a significant part of our economy.
    Some people behave like AI is some sort of .com bubble, but from an economic viewpoint that doesn’t make the slightest bit of sense. The investment landscape into AI is completely different from the .com speculation that was completely void of content.

    AI is financed by established players that develop and use AI themselves, while .com was venture capital investing in ideas with no purpose.
    Tesla may burst, because they try to sell themselves as an AI company, but they are so far behind it’s ridiculous.
    I suspect the Tesla bubble may burst in 5-10 years.