• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s dumb. As an actor, I can understand it, but as the producer, he definitely bears responsibility for the actions of the crew.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Did you read WHY it was dismissed?

      It was due to the actions of the police and prosecutor withholding evidence improperly.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          If you bring a case against someone in bad faith, you shouldn’t be able to prosecute it again when you get caught. Otherwise there’s no consequence for the state when they don’t play by the rules.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            True, but the mechanism for that should be consequences for the prosecutors themselves, not bypassing justice and absolving the accused.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              If it hadn’t been detected, a potentially innocent person goes to jail.

              (I’m aware someone died, but the case wasn’t over yet)

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Right. They should resolve the issue with the evidence and retry the case fairly.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The prosecution is an entity. They can’t bring the case again.

            • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Not that I agree with you, but what’s your idea of the prosecutor’s consequence? A fine? Firing? Disbarment?

              • Grimy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Tbh, they should get disbarred as well. If playing dirty just turns into a stroke of luck for the accused and nothing more, it doesn’t really do much to stop the prosecution from doing it again. They get paid to play dirty and just move on to the next one when caught.

                • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Exactly where I was going with my question. There would need to be steep penalties for being caught trying to undermine the process. Even if they had made an honest mistake, I feel the individuals holding the power of a prosecutor should be expected to held to a higher standard, and therefore higher consequence.

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m not familiar with how discipline for a prosecutor works, but I assume there is some process.