• az04@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    INB4 it’s gonna be a repeat of the Wii U. A confusing, non compatible successor to a revolutionary product.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      INB4 it’s gonna be a repeat of the Wii U. A confusing, non compatible successor to a revolutionary product.

      A bit too revolutionary. Wii had a seriously bad attachment rate. People bought Wii Sports, Mario Kart and Smash. Regular games sold badly. Wii was a party gimmick that collected dust on regular days. Wii U was the attempt (later fulfilled by Switch) to be a regular gaming machine as well.

      • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes but the main reason those consoles were so shaky is specifically because they did not address a much younger audience. The original Wii kind of tried to but if you look at its best sellers, a ton of them were not aimed at adults.

        The same is true of the Wii U where rather than targeting that audience, they tried to pivot to a more adult console with games like the zombie launch title.

        So most of the success of the switch is just that it finally was a family console again. But keep in mind, they have nowhere to pivot to. That’s why the switch 2 is what it is and why it’s so late. They can’t afford a misstep and they also can’t afford to saturate the only market niche they have left.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think I’ve read backwards compatibility is confirmed, which these days there’s no excuse not to.

        I think they confirmed that during a message to investors.