In May 2024, the United States imposed new sanctions on three Russian government entities and four Russian companies in response to its full-scale war and use of chemical weapons against Ukraine. The United States determined Russia used the chemical weapon chloropicrin against Ukrainian troops and riot control agents (RCA) as a method of warfare in violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).
Chloropicrin is a choking agent that “causes severe irritation to the skin, eyes, respiratory tract (if inhaled), and gastrointestinal tract (if inhaled or ingested).” In cases of severe exposure, it can be deadly causing “potentially fatal accumulation of fluid in the lungs.”
Russia’s use of such chemicals is not an isolated incident, and is probably driven by Russian forces’ desire to dislodge Ukrainian forces from fortified positions and drive them into the line of fire, the exact reason the CWC prohibits the use of RCA as method of warfare, and achieve tactical gains on the battlefield. Russia retains an undeclared chemical weapons program and has used chemical weapons, such as the Novichok nerve agents, at least twice in recent years in assassination attempts.
Cover Up and Distract
To conceal and divert attention from its violations, the Kremlin routinely spreads unfounded and debunked allegations accusing the United States and Ukraine of using chemical and biological weapons activities in Ukraine. Russia uses this well-established disinformation tactic, sometimes referred to as “mirror politics,” to falsely accuse others of the very violations Russia commits or plans to commit.
In the lead-up to the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Russia’s disinformation and propaganda ecosystem falsely accused the United States and Ukraine of planning “provocations” (false flag operations) with the use of chemical weapons, likely in an attempt to demonize Ukraine and provide a pretext for Kremlin aggression. Since Russia’s full-scale invasion began, the Kremlin has continuously spread false claims about Ukrainian chemical weapons, alleging to have discovered “chemically hazardous substances,” accusing Ukraine of using UAVs adapted for chemical weapons use, and claiming that the United States supports Ukraine’s use of chemical weapons. All of these claims are deceptive.
It is, in fact, the Russian Federation that has an active chemical weapons program and is in violation of its international obligations under the CWC.
Russian Soldiers Admit to Using RCAs
As the Kremlin disseminates false accusations against Ukraine and the United States, Russian soldiers and pro-Kremlin media brag about the Russian Army’s use of RCAs in Ukraine.
In May 2024, Russia’s state-funded media outlet RT [3 MB] published a video report on Telegram claiming to show a “gas grenade” used by the Russian Army against Ukrainian soldiers.
In May 2023, Russia’s state-controlled Channel 1 broadcast an interview with a Russian soldier describing the Russian Army’s use of tear gas to “smoke out” Ukrainian forces. In the video, drone footage shows a grenade being dropped into a trench, smoke billowing from the trench, and then soldiers fleeing from the trench. On the broadcast, the soldier states, “We are trying to force them out with smoke.” The broadcast goes on to state, “Soldiers from the 88th Brigade are using the so-called ‘Bird-Cherry’ tear grenades.” According to independent media outlet Meduza, Bird-Cherry tear grenades, known in Russian as Cheremukha, may “contain the chemical warfare agent chloroacetophenone. The substance can cause a burning sensation in the eyes, corneal clouding, and vision impairment, as well as shortness of breath, coughing, and burns on the skin.”
In October 2023, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK, and the United States asked Russia to explain the above-described Channel 1 broadcast. To date, Russia has claimed that its forces’ statements were a “misunderstanding.”
In December 2023, Russia’s 810th Naval Infantry Brigade stated on its Telegram channel that the brigade is using a “radical change in tactics” by dropping K-51 grenades on Ukrainian forces to “smoke them out from their fortified positions.” According to the Institute for the Study of War, the Brigade later edited the post in an apparent effort to hide Russia’s violation of the CWC. In January 2024, the Brigade published another post about receiving a “combat order” to use K-51 grenades and reported using them.
Russian soldiers talked about using drones to drop the Bird-Cherry tear grenades on Ukrainian positions in interviews with the Russian media and there have been several posts on Telegram (examples 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) by pro-Kremlin actors, mostly by the so-called “pro-war bloggers,” describing the use of RCAs by Russia’s armed forces.
On March 4, Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense reported that Russia carried out 1,068 chemical weapons attacks since the beginning of the full-scale invasion. British media outlet The Telegraph on April 6 confirmed that “Russian troops are carrying out a systematic campaign of illegal chemical attacks against Ukrainian soldiers.”
History of Kremlin Chemical Weapons Use and Disinformation Campaigns
Russia’s use of chloropicrin in Ukraine marks the first time since World War One that this agent is being deployed on the battlefield, but the Kremlin had used chloropicrin before. For example, in 1989, the Soviet Union used chloropicrin against demonstrators in Georgia.
The Kremlin has a history of spreading disinformation about chemical weapons. The Russian government spreads false claims to shield its ally, the Syrian regime, from accountability after the Assad regime’s repeated use of chemical weapons from 2013-2019. The Kremlin also denied its own responsibility for the 2018 Novichok poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in the United Kingdom and the subsequent, related death of a UK citizen in Amesbury. The Kremlin also tried to evade responsibility for the Novichok poisoning of the late Russian opposition politician and anti-corruption activist Aleksey Navalny in 2020. In those cases, Kremlin propagandists resorted to the same tactics we observe today in Ukraine, blaming others for Russia’s own crimes and invoking so-called “provocations.”
In each case, the Kremlin used its seat in multilateral organizations, such as the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), as a platform to spread its disinformation. Despite Russia’s attempts to use disinformation to lobby officials from various countries, Moscow lost (for the first time in its history) its seat on the Executive Council of the OPCW on November 29 to Ukraine, Lithuania, and Poland. This rejection demonstrated OPCW States Parties’ resolve to hold Russia to account for its actions – including its war of aggression against Ukraine and continued violations of the CWC.
By spreading disinformation through media and from international platforms, Russia attempts to create confusion and obfuscate facts to sow enough doubt to undermine the unity and effectiveness of an international response to Russia’s own chemical weapons use. The international community remains united – Russia’s use of chemical weapons is unacceptable.
This is where in a sane world independent journalists would see allegations like these and properly investigate and bring us the truth of the matter. But we don’t live in a world where that happens often anymore.
Agreed.
The disinformation campaigns in the states have been robust. The intelligence agencies have made sure the truth is hard to discern. That coupled with the average person just ingesting a headline and moving on is pretty concerning.
There are some real journalists out there still but they usual receive a lot of pressure from the state.