What opinion just makes you look like you aged 30 years

  • The Baldness@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not subscribing to anything. If I buy something, it’s fully functional, and it’s mine. There is no ongoing relationship between me and the manufacturer. Done.

    • Mackie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m working on this, the subscription model has gotten so expensive now that literally everything uses it. Do you have any tips besides “just pirate everything”?

    • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anything that doesn’t incur an ongoing cost to provide should be legally prohibited from being sold as a “subscription.”

        • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except more and more companies are hopping on this gravy train because they can get away with it. At some point (and that point may be now already, depending on the sector), it’s going to be difficult-to-impossible to buy anything without this subscription bullshit.

    • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt you’ll find anyone here that disagrees with you. I was going to get an older pixel but I got a 6 instead and I’m still grieving the loss of my headphone jack.

        • OptimsticDolphin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But then you can’t charge at the same time, no good if you want to plug your phone into some speakers and charge it at the same time

            • dwindling7373@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              My take: cables are a sustainable, effective and ELEGANT solution. Most wireless solutions fall under the definition of over-engineering.

              Cable: a properly lengthened cheap rope that magically transfers information, power and anchor stuff together.

              Wireless: two antenna, encoding of all kind, radiations, BATTERIES, higher chance to lose stuff, degrading of quality (Bluetooth).

  • Shrek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Music in restaurants and bars is just too loud. I know why the music is loud, but I am still going to shake my fist at it like Grandpa Simpson.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. It’s getting worse over time too, I can hardly hear anything anyone is saying in restaurants and bars anymore.

      I felt my inner boomer grow stronger after writing that.

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve thought this since I was young. Background music? Cool, keep it quiet so we can talk.

      Does this mean loud music is bad? No, I’ve been a put my head in the PA speakers metal head since I was young too. But I don’t expect a waiter to serve me then.

      Beyond that, it’s a known problem that as you get older audio distractions become more severe, and I’m sure there’s a neurodivergent dimension to it too, so it’s one of those things where we are actively punishing people for wanting to be out and socialise. Also sure it’s one of those things where everyone thinks they have to do it but don’t

  • Elbullazul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cars shouldn’t be loaded with user-facing technology. Bring back analog dashboards and buttons for climate control!

      • rolaulten@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting fact: I just got a new ev (so a battery hooked up to a computer with wheels) - and it has buttons! It also has dials for sound and climate.

        Now to be fair it also takes interacting with a touchscreen to turn on the heated seats, but I’d say it’s progress in the right direction.

    • StringTheory@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bring back stick-shift, too. People shouldn’t be driving if they have no grasp of the mass and inertia of their car. We should be able to disengage the engine at will. And we should have to pay attention when we drive.

  • Npenplz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Smart tech in general is annoying and dumb. I want my TV to just be a tv with inputs, I don’t need built in firmware and updates to shove ads in my face. I don’t want my car to have a touch screen to adjust the A/C, just give me a knob or buttons.

  • Glokosame@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t want to have a subscription for everything. It used to be possible to pay a one-time fee for software and use it as long as I want. Now I have to pay a monthly fee and once I finish paying, I can’t use the software anymore. And it’s not like I constantly get updates for the software. Often it stays the same for months or years.

    I understand that software has a price, but no way these prices are sometimes justified…

  • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Algorithms that try to suggest me content are universally bad, and all searches should provide results based solely on the terms, syntax, and language entered. Same with anything that tries to provide me content based on data harvested about my location or demographic.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to be mad at algorythms suggesting things that is disliked. But then I realised that it would be rather scary if they were right.

    • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it has its place but it should absolutely be optional. Yeah they suck but the YouTube algorithm is responsible for like 70% of my knowledge base.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I miss accidentally finding the most random stuff on YouTube way back before they started pushing monetized content, but it’s been a very long time

    • Leigh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like that Lemmy and Masto don’t have those fucking algorithms. It’s a relief.

      • StoicLime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is your opinion on Bluesky? Their default feed is chronological, but they do have algorithms. They’re actually moving towards custom algorithms, so you can build your own or use someone else’s, delete, pin, reorder them. It’s like different feeds. I like that implementation personally.

    • TauZero@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never have I ever benefited from Google or Amazon or anyone changing my search string for me. Even if I do misspell something, I’m gonna click on the “did you mean x instead?” link myself, because I don’t trust the 50/50 mixed results anyway. But 90% of the time I’m gonna be immediately scrambling to put the double quotes back in, which it’s also gonna ignore half the time.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hard agree. Sometimes I’m searching for something very specific and esoteric, and the results spam me with unrelated nonsense because the search engine thinks it knows better than I do

  • 1337@1337lemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sneaker culture is incredibly weird. Shoes made by children in China with a limited edition color are in such high demand that there are sites where people refresh F5 constantly hoping to have the honor to pay hundreds and hundreds for shoes that cost $7.50 to make. Then half of the time people won’t even wear them outside, they’ll put them in a bag and change shoes when they get to work or whatever. Or some might not even wear the shoes at all and just display them.

    I’m an old soul in this sense. I love a quality goodyear welted shoe, and made in USA, UK, or Italy usually. An Allen Edmonds strandmok is a fantastic everyday shoe for me. I like to purchase nice things in general, use them, take care of them. I really hate throwaway culture as well.

    Please nobody hate me for this, I’m a bit self conscious being an admin of my own instance and don’t want to piss people off haha. If you’re into gym shoe culture that’s awesome. If I knew you in real life I’d probably make fun of you for a minute if I saw you walking outside in socks carrying your $400 limited edition sneakers, but then you can make fun of me for one of the thousands of things I do and it’s all in good fun.

      • Mr_Grumpy@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many of the younger generations seem to accept that things don’t last/break easily. I come from a time where there was a wiring diagram for the TV pasted on the inside back cover. Washing machines and other devices often had the schematics included. Repairing your stuff and keeping it running was the norm back then. Even if you couldn’t, you probably had a neighbour who could. Planned obsolescence is a relatively new thing.

      • emerty@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Things used to be made like this. Only boomers are old enough to remember buying an iron for life.

    • SmugBedBug@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like this could go either way whether it’s a boomer opinion or not. Real boomers are not very tech literate and probably don’t have much of a notion of online privacy.

      On the other hand for those that were adults in the early years of the internet, they likely think we’re all giving away too much of our private information.

      • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Boomers (my parents’ generation) were telling us 90’s kids how dangerous it was to put your information online, but then it seemed once social media happened they all forgot about such privacy concerns entirely. They were right the first time!

    • t0fr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree with the sentiment, but this feels like the least boomer opinion ngl

      • JillyB@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think it’s simultaneously an opinion held by very old people who remember when they could just walk to the store and younger urbanists that want us to return to that. The people in the middle grew up in a car oriented society that hadn’t completely lost small businesses and been locked down by traffic. And they now have a house way out in the burbs with a disdain for the traffic of the city. Urbanism threatens their way of life now. That’s my opinion.

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most of the US has dug a hole that can’t easily be fixed with its car-centric developments, people living there pretty much need a car for everything.

          Driving there may be a pleasure, but I personally wouldn’t want to live in that situation at all. I’m glad and lucky to have the equivalent of a mall just a 10 minute bike ride away, 25 minute walk, 5 minute bus trip.

          • JillyB@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            America is definitely pretty deeply invested in car-centeic living. But I don’t think it’s impossible to get out of it. There’s rising pressure to lower housing costs, traffic, and improve infrastructure quality. My city (which is about as car centric as it gets) is growing fast and most of that is with infil development. It’s going to be a slow transformation but I think it will happen. I don’t think American cities will look like European or Asian cities because they won’t evolve the same way. But they will look different to how they look now.

            • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yep I agree - It’s definitely possible for the US to shift away from it, some cities have even been transforming some of their busy central roads into pedestrianised boulevards (such as times square in NY, and a couple others I can’t remember off the top of my head) and from an outsiders perspective been successful.

              The difficulty is mainly going to be places like Culver City where some just don’t get that cars don’t scale well in dense urban areas like cities - they’ve voted to remove a 2 year old bike lane just to get back an additional driving lane. That’s just going to move most of the bike riders back into their cars, filling that brand new driving lane (and the other existing driving lanes) with traffic that previously didn’t exist. Hopefully over time positive changes will return though!