Deegham@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 年前measuring rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square282fedilinkarrow-up11.39Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.39Karrow-down1imagemeasuring rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneDeegham@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 年前message-square282fedilink
minus-squareThisOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前Lol can’t tell, is this 85% stupid or closer to 100?
minus-squareThisOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 年前Not nearly as hard as you are working to represent F in chat about personal preference
minus-squareFal@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前I WILL die on this hill. But preference is just what you do with the information, not the usefulness of the scale. 0-100 is the scale. Whether you wear jackets at 50-60 or 60-70 doesn’t mean that the scale isn’t objectively better.
minus-squareThisOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前Oh yea I think I do agree with you that the C scale is objectively better.
minus-squareFal@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前Cope harder. F is objectively better for environment. C is objectively better for scientific calculation
minus-squareThisOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-22 年前Oof you really trying to get others to die on that hill with ya huh?
Lol can’t tell, is this 85% stupid or closer to 100?
Are percentages too hard for you?
Not nearly as hard as you are working to represent F in chat about personal preference
I WILL die on this hill. But preference is just what you do with the information, not the usefulness of the scale. 0-100 is the scale. Whether you wear jackets at 50-60 or 60-70 doesn’t mean that the scale isn’t objectively better.
Oh yea I think I do agree with you that the C scale is objectively better.
Cope harder. F is objectively better for environment. C is objectively better for scientific calculation
Oof you really trying to get others to die on that hill with ya huh?
You’re objectively dumb