• TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 days ago

    I thought paraquat wasn’t used anymore. It got a lot of attention in the 70s when it was divulged that it was being sprayed on marijuana. SNL did jokes about sending in your weed to be checked by the cast.

    • RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 days ago

      After Biden banned glyphosate, Trump entered office and had the EPA relax restrictions on paraquat so Monsanto could change their Roundup formula and keep selling tons of carcinogenic poison.

      The national forest service under Trump is now spraying actual tons of Roundup all over the ground cover in forests, particularly in California as part of the orange diaper man’s personal revenge against states that don’t like him.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Paraquat has mostly been used on alfalfa hay recently in California. However it’s sprayed on all sorts of stuff from cotton to peanuts. It has an extensive label and is still used quite extensively in the U.S.

  • 3holly3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    “To be phased out over the next two years” Why not just pull the fucking plug if it’s so blatantly lethal. Boils my blood….

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s always money…

      Suppliers have contracted for shipments already or hold inventory of the chemical in their warehouses.

      Farmers have purchased the chemistry and have some in their supplies.

      When they ban a chemistry they normally do a phase out to allow them to use existing inventory and not lose money.

      If they didn’t give them time to use the inventory, the suppliers and farmers could sue the government for losses incurred due to regulation changes. The government would likely lose the lawsuits and have to pay millions.

      • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        The government would likely lose the lawsuits and have to pay millions.

        This could be in addition to the judicial just reversing the regulation to top it off.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    US still uses paraquat? This was banned in Canada in 2022 after definitive studies showing it causes Parkinson disease.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        To be faiiiir

        Citizens getting too sick to work and dying is bad for GDP.

        So the American government doesn’t even give a shit about that.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          no it’s a win for them because then the corporate overlords will either purchase the land from the family or replace the workers on the farm they already own.

          it’s TBTF

  • jwt@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Americans can always be trusted to do the right thing, once all other possibilities have been exhausted.”

  • livligkinkajou@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I like maps, I found these from Feb, 2026 by EWG (Environmental Working Group):

    In the USA before California’s ban:

    Nations that have banned paraquat in white:

    Note for Canada:

    In Canada, Syngenta was the only paraquat manufacturer with a registered product. Syngenta discontinued registering its product in Canada in 2023 following updated risk-mitigation efforts. Although there is not an outright ban, no paraquat products are sold in Canada.

  • BeBopALouie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    It was used to spray pot crops in Mexico back in the 70’s or at least that was the rumour.

  • huppakee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not to say this isn’t uplifting news, but why wasn’t this posted the previous 70 times a country banned this 🤔

      • huppakee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I mean it’s great for the people of California but if we would post every single pesticide and every herbacide getting banned for every place in the world this community is going to see a lot of content. Downvote me all you want, but this stuff has been banned (as the title says) in over 70 countries already. California is not even the first US state to ban it. Again this is great news for the wellbeing of the people in California but in the bigger picture this is not really news. Sorry to be a partypooper.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          California has an insanely huge population and also gdp.

          As of 2025, California’s gross domestic product (GDP) is $4.251 trillion, making it the largest state economy in the U.S. and the fourth largest in the world.

          If anything, if we’re going to be jerks and say what locale deserves to be posted about and which doesn’t, I think most of those 70 other countries have less standing to be posted about.

          If the fourth largest economy on planet earth banning a widely used toxic chemical isn’t news, almost nothing is.