• trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Fun fact: lots of them have exposed cables that should not be cut with a long arm pruning pole found in your grandmother’s shed.

  • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I just learned HGTV has a Jan 7 2026 show called “Neighborhood Watch”. It’s like America’s Funniest Home Videos, but it’s all doorbell/security cameras. User-submitted, I think. I absolutely refuse to believe this was a casual idea from HGTV as they struggle to maintain viewership. There’s no way this isn’t funded by one of these companies, meant to continue making everyone comfortable with constant surveillance and increasing the desire to have constant recording devices to catch these one-off comedic moments.

    Tagline: “Everywhere you go, cameras are recording. Your neighbors are watching.”

      • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        That’s the beauty of downvotes: no f-ing context on why people disagree with you or if they even do and are just holding a vendetta from somewhere else, since they aren’t forced to indicate why.

        The account enjoys making a lot of very questionably inconsistent downvotes over their far fewer upvotes and even comments their own suggestion on how to sabotage Flock surveillance cameras in the thread yet doesn’t seem to be an edgelord in their own comments, so who knows. Unlike upvoting, where you presumably agree with a comment, downvoting provides no context as you have no clue why or how much they disagreed with something. Presumably the statement was too simplistic to resonate with their refined tastes, which to avoid the downvote should presumably have been stated with the collection of words they would favor as an argument, if they ever bothered to make it.

  • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Powerfull hand held lasers can damage cameras, by pointing the laser at the lens.

  • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Yeah, I was actually thinking about acquiring one myself. I want to dissect it, hook it up to some monitoring equipment/ software, see what I can learn about it… functionality, vulnerability, anything. But I’m also worried about the potential I accidentally show up on a video feed stored somewhere remote. I’ve been checking eBay for them, but honestly… there are several right by my home. We’ll see what happens, in time.

  • Ranulph@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This seems to be a valid self-defence tactic. Grinder, large bumper with a push bar, what ever it takes to drop the device. Truck Bros can back up to the pole and push. They are designed to break away after all

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, give them a nice clear picture of your license plate as it tumbles down…broadcast right to their servers

      • Ranulph@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        We had a guy here who stole a plate of a cop car and drove through a speed enforcement camera to the tune of $6000 worth of fines to the cop car. Not saying you should do anything like that but you have to respect his hustle

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Well, the CEO did openly invite and approve of this. In his own words, Flock cameras aren’t forced on anyone. So the only logical conclusion is to destroy them if so desired.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Anyone know of a good form letter / well written petition to request an operator such as an hoa remove a flock camera before resorting tk this?

    • Bgugi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Lol. HOAs are on a strict boot-based diet. Any well-reasoned argument will just make them install MORE of them.

      Also: I really want to introduce the neologism caligavore. Can we all make that a thing?

    • Null User Object@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If you go this route, you’ll be suspect #1 if anyone else ever takes more aggressive defensive measures against the cameras.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This behavior from companies is so predictable that I’m perpetually disappointed in my fellow human beings for ever buying this equipment.

  • BanMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    11 hours ago

    There’s one a block from my house, and three blocks from my work, so they can see me coming and going each direction.

    …BRB

    • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There’s two on each of the roads to my favorite local freeway and there’s two in the parking lot of my local hardware store

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This is exactly what this company deserves, to be smashed out of business and history.

    Reminder: If you destroy a camera, be aware that other cameras in the area may be recording you as well. Protect your identity.

      • exaybachae@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Faraday bags work… But test them.

        I got a cheapo $7 Chromebook sized bag that seemed to work for my SOs iphone. We don’t use NFC so I couldn’t test that.

        No BT, WiFi, or Cell, and probably no GPS.

        I only did casual testing.

        The screen still showed the signal having low bars for WiFi and cellular, but it didn’t actually receive a signal at all when trying to call or use the net, not even with the top of the bag open a sliver and my hand in there.

        If the device was off or in airplane mode and in the bag, I’d be comfortable assuming it was safely hidden from tracking.

        I haven’t thoroughly tested my various personal devices, but I expect identical results.

        I think everyone should probably have a bag like this around, in a go-bag or something, just in case. And it’s safer to have your phone available than not, as long as it’s secure (use a pin or password to lock it, use encryption, put emergency info on it for first responders).

        • Agent641@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          If you’re going to use a Faraday bag, use it regularly, like every day at random times.

          Imagine you are being accused of a crime. The crime occured at 8pm. The phone records show that your phone went dark at your house 7pm and then reconnected at 9pm at your house. The crime scene is 1 hour away from your home by foot. Records show this is the only time your phone went dark in a very long time.

          So if you bag your phone (aluminium foil bags work pretty good too), do it regularly, randomly, and don’t bag it and unbag it immediately before leaving or after getting home