• MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I mean… They have to.

    Countries are making it law, so sooner or later, fedi projects are going to have to deal with that crap.

    • Skavau@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Do they? There’s one thing to make it law, another thing to enforce it. OSA in the UK has been around since last July and managed to do nothing other than pick a fight with 4chan and get nowhere. I seem to recall someone mentioned Lemmy to Ofcom in a discussion regarding OSA and they were literally like “What’s a Lemmy?”

      How on earth do you imagine a regulator is going to work out how to deal with 50+ federated instances (for instance)?

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I mean if they can really just do nothing, then that is also something it would be good to be sure about.

        Nintendo has shown that it is possible to attack open source projects at the repository level, and while that wouldn’t necessarily stop development, it would be a step down to force development technically “underground”.

        And if instances have to start being regularly replaced, that WILL cause attrition.

        • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Nintendo has shown that it is possible to attack open source projects at the repository level

          I’m out of the loop. What happened there?

          • bonn2@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Probably talking about Nintendos recent re-crackdown on the repos of Switch emulators.

        • Skavau@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I just think this is a logistical dead-end for regulators who may rely on the chilling effect of the thought of being targeted rather than actually being targeted. Unless the Fediverse somehow becomes massive, I don’t see that it’ll ever enter their eyes. Especially as many places will be based in the USA who is the least likely country to implement these laws, and the most hostile to any threats from foreign regulators (see again the 4chan example).

          • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Especially as many places will be based in the USA who is the least likely country to implement these laws

            uh, what?

            • Skavau@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yes? USA is the least likely to do this. Porn laws in various states don’t apply to social media.

              Other attempts have been stuck in legislative hell, been unenforced or have court cases challenging their legality (Mississipi)

              • Twongo [she/her]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 hours ago

                US Tech firms profit the most from it, the verification data lands on some palantir server - as the recent discord fiasco implied.

      • Skavau@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Wikipedia took UK to court over the fear of being targeted, it was dismissed purely on the basis of “Well they haven’t done anything to you yet”. And Ofcom clearly hasn’t got the balls to do it.