• Skavau@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I just think this is a logistical dead-end for regulators who may rely on the chilling effect of the thought of being targeted rather than actually being targeted. Unless the Fediverse somehow becomes massive, I don’t see that it’ll ever enter their eyes. Especially as many places will be based in the USA who is the least likely country to implement these laws, and the most hostile to any threats from foreign regulators (see again the 4chan example).

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Especially as many places will be based in the USA who is the least likely country to implement these laws

      uh, what?

      • Skavau@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes? USA is the least likely to do this. Porn laws in various states don’t apply to social media.

        Other attempts have been stuck in legislative hell, been unenforced or have court cases challenging their legality (Mississipi)

        • Twongo [she/her]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          US Tech firms profit the most from it, the verification data lands on some palantir server - as the recent discord fiasco implied.