• rainwall@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    WARN only kicks in at a 100 people or more laid off, and it only gives you 60 days notice, not any extra pay or benefits.

    Its basically the least they can do, and the 100 person threshold gives lots of orgs plently of room to skirt it by doing small, and steady layoffs instead.

    It also has to be enforced. Musk laid off thousands of people at Twitter and didnt follow WARN, just paid them 60 days instead. He was sued by individual people, but didnt suffer any penalty for breaking the law itself.

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Couldn’t he phrase it as “you will be laid off in 60 days and you’re getting 60 days of bonus PTO”? I don’t see the issue with no warning if they still get paid.

      • rainwall@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        As I recall, they didnt follow WARN at all, just firing thousands people left and right, and only after the fact when they started getting sued did they say “well your severance worked out to 60 days, so that counts.”

        I do remember that one of the sale conditions was that all previous employee perks were retained, which twitter had very good severance, like 1 months/pay per year at the company. Some of the lawsuits were about that not being honored.