And yes, I know people will say block keywords and communities, but people don’t understand some communities have rules and people must follow them.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This got reported as being not twitter or equal. I’m kind of on the fence about this. I see their point, but the original was twitter. Please tell me what you think in the comments, not just downvote or upvote. This will guide me in the future if we have any more posts like this.

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I havent read the rules of the comm. but ive always perceived whitepeopletwitter as a place to post text based social media screenshots.

    • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      It probably shouldn’t be allowed in the future, but given that it has > 300 up-votes and is only now spurring a finer definition of the rule, I think it warrants an exception. If OP reads this, they now know to post this kinda thing in a different community in the future. But removing this particular post seems a little harsh.

      Edit: This is an awesome approach to moderation btw. People like you make lemmy great, thank you!

      • rose56@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        I was searching for a community to post it, but I couldn’t find any. This one seemed closer to the idea l, a post where it says something. I also think I saw a photo from Facebook in this community, so…m Maybe we need a community about posts like these, but not twitter.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      People like this need to accept and understand that we don’t want to talk about US politics everywhere, all the time.

    • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Fighting to remove as many posts as possible on Lemmy when we barely get any posts at all doesn’t make sense; ignore the people requesting you take a popular post down for some potential technicality.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I am not sure how this changes the “the post was against the states rules which are there for a reason and the mod was the absolute most gentle about it” facts.

        Did I get the facts wrong?

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Let me guess, European hosted? Yeah I ditched them for their suppression of pro-Luigi speech. Fuck em.

  • darthinvidious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I don’t understand why have comms literally about politics and world news if you’re just going to post the same stuff to any other comm that really doesn’t need that kind of content. If people keep ignoring what belongs where, why have comms at all? Idk, maybe it’s my OCD talking…

  • JustTheWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    When it comes to activism, I’ve often said that, ‘most people know the difference between a good vegan and a bad vegan’. Being insufferable, overbearing, or pushing discussions where they aren’t needed or wanted does nothing to help your cause, it usually does the opposite. When you talk to most people who ascribe to a certain political, lifestyle, or activist way of life, you’ll usually find that most of them are pretty normal and non-pervasive people; IE you may never even know those details without asking them. This goes for most things. Fitness enthusiast vs gym bro. Music/Media enjoyers vs gatekeepers. Activist who promote and provide good accurate information in a hands off way, vs those who push political messaging where it’s not wanted. Be a good vegan.

  • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Great, I said we need to talk more about Alex…and the collective fediverse said we need to not talk about politics. Real fucking clown shoes this place.

    • dermanus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 minutes ago

      Lol, so clearly you’re not done with Lemmy.

      Also, they’re right. Most of the world does not live in the US. Not everything needs to be about you. That kind of exceptionalism is one of the reasons your country is not popular right now.

  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    has a very mild run-in with one singular community’s admin “That’s it, I’m done with the entire platform !”

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “It’s so unfair!” … as if the identical thing is not being done to literally everyone else all the time. Toddler logic.

      A nuance that people often miss about lemmy.ml’s authoritarian policies - whereby they ban people from communities they’ve never even seen before - is not that it is done, but that when it is it cites a hidden set of rules that are nowhere ever written down. Little kid logic, where the rules mean whatever they feel like in that moment, and if you don’t like it then feel free to try to stop them.

      Some people here are pushing for fascist Reddit 2.0, others for free-speech Voat, but most of us just want to get along somewhere in the middle without too much bother:-P.

        • Djehngo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Turns out when you build a platform around anti-censorship you wind up with a small number of free speech enthusiasts and a large number of people who will be banned from any site with rules against hate speech.

          Then when you have a site where 80% of the content is racism the 20% non racists leave.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yes, you got me: by “hidden rules” I obviously meant the very highly visible, non-hidden ones, placed where nobody can miss them at the top of the page.

        • Sir. Haxalot@nord.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          The rules only matter if the admins adhere to them and enforces them consistently.

        • monkeyjoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Those hidden rules, shown openly and have working links. So hidden. I heard McDonald’s hides the Big Mac from the public too.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The issue with a “no politics” rule though is that everything is political. It ends up just being the mods removing what they want to remove and letting what they want to see stay.

      • sexy_peach@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Okay and if the users of that community are happy with that and you are free to stay away, where is the problem exactly?

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The issue is that users generally don’t get a say. Even in the fediverse, moderators aren’t chosen democratically. Yeah, you can start your own community and try to build it up, but inertia is not in your favor.

          Anyway, my point is that a “no politics” rule is not really reasonable. You can have one, and you can enforce it however you want. It will always just end up causing issues though. For example: look up Nazi degenerate art. It’s just art, right? However, to them it was political, and it was political in a way they didn’t like, so they removed it from society.

          No moderator is perfect. Even if you trust them, blurry rules probably aren’t the best. There’s better ways to define the intent than “no politics” that create clear borders of what’s allowed and what isn’t. Blurry rules are usually best for those who want to abuse it.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I just saw this post on “All”. I’m not part of this community and I don’t care to open an alternative for it. I’m just point out how blurry rules are open for abuse. Just because you agree with the person running things today doesn’t mean someone in the future won’t use it to remove something you want to stay. I don’t understand how people don’t get this yet.

          • sexy_peach@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            The issue is that users generally don’t get a say.

            Yes that is because they don’t carry any of the responsibilities of running the server. Why would they be allowed to decide?

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              I didn’t say they should. Your comment implied that they did (or at least implies participation is consent). I just pointed out that they, in fact, do not. There is no value judgement in that statement.

  • thlibos@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    As somebody who just came here from Reddit, I find all of these communities refreshingly free of American politics.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I have the complete opposite experience, I almost cannot escape it here. My reddit infinite scroll was way more diverse, here it’s exclusively american politics and linux, and if it wasn’t for linux I would quit this whole platform

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 hours ago

      On a side note, welcome.

      If you haven’t figured this out already and your front page feels stale, then switch around to “Hot,” “Top 6 Hours” or “Active.” Active is the default and feels stale on topics.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Time, place, audience. Daft_ish thinks Lemmy needs a reminder that Alex Pretti was murdered in broad daylight? Imagining them walking up to Greta Thunberg while she’s eating a vegan soup for dinner and reminding her about how awful commercial fishing is

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Daft_ish has got a real problem if they’re that outraged by the mod’s response. I’ve seen plenty of powertriping arseholes to be mad at in my time, but this isn’t it.

    US politics, including about the ICE murders, is spoken about more than enough across the English speaking internet.

    I know as much about current US politics as I do my own country’s politics, because you can’t get away from it without blocking most posts on here.

    Which is to say that some of us would just like to have a space to NOT talk or think about politics, including US politics.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I know more about US politics than my own country’s politics, which is a problem because it’s an election year and the Nazis need to get out of parliament.

      I need to get into the details of things so I can do my civic duty, but I’m fucking exhausted from all the American politics that for my own sanity I just don’t want to.

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Exactly. The far right of most countries barely even need to try anymore, the US has gotten so good at flooding the news that they even burn out people from other countries from the constant cynicism

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Which is to say that some of us would just like to have a space to NOT talk or think about politics, including US politics.

      Inb4: “You’re just privileged enough not to have to think about it.”

      No, I just want a brief goddamn respite every once in a while, everybody deserves that. Just because I want to be able to escape into a fantasy world sometimes doesn’t mean that I never talk about politics either, it’s like cheating on your diet, just let me have a fucking cookie every now and again ffs!

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Exactly. We’re not blind or don’t care about politics. I’m more than aware of my country’s problems and the US’s…

        But how am I meant to not burn out on this stuff if I can’t get away from it?

        Sure I could just detox from social media and go work on something that interests me, and that’s what I do most of the time…

        But sometimes I do still want to chat with others, and it’d be nice to be able to do that and have it not be about politics.

      • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        This 100%. I care about politics. I deeply care about what’s happening with our country.

        But I’ve had to pare down the places where I see it. I’ve stopped watching Last Week Tonight because it makes me feel so powerless on what I have control over. I absolutely love the show but I just…can’t anymore.

        I’m acting locally, participating in whatever protests I can, calling and emailing my reps as often as I can.

        But man…the right’s “flood the zone” works effectively and I can’t just keep burning out.

    • DragonOracleIX@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I feel the same way. I mostly just been using lemmy on my work breaks, and the last thing I want to see while stressed out is American politics.

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I already block so many keywords and communities here. It’s hard to keep up.

    Thank you mods for helping keep some places free of US politics.

  • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 day ago

    I won’t say all rules are valid or right, but this one just makes sense (in contrast to rules of some other communities, which outright ban certain opinions). Sometimes you don’t want to hear about all the doom and gloom, and for many people, it’s not good for their mental health to hear about it all the time. They know what’s happening, they need some time off.

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, sometimes on the old place, you woukd seeposts removed for being political, on like, a news sub.

      Like WTF, basically all polotocs literally is news, though not all news is political.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That said, I’m fine with having a general “news” that allows it all, “political news” that is strictly political, “apolitical news” that allows everything else but politics, “uplifting news” that is actually uplifting, “climate news” that is specifically about that, “science news” etc etc. This is the internet we can make the comms, we’re not running out of room to store them.

        I think part of why it’s like this here is that in the beginning, before the exodus, it was necessary to keep comms broad because there were like 12 people here, but now it’s like 3y on, and I think we can get more specific now.

        Another, larger part is the annoying hexbear and grad users, after annoying everyone so hard with oh y’know putting their politics where it didn’t belong (“weird” that it’s the same issue now) they got largely defederated, they started migrating to alts on other instances and instead of learning their lesson on why nobody likes them and pushing their politics where it does belong they just continue because the evangelism is the point.