Subjectively speaking. Or maybe not.

Please try and resist the urge to say humans, I’m sure it crossed everyone’s mind

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    yeah settlements they can vamp off of.

    who’s taking the case that’s not going to get a settlement? you do realize not everything is settled for money right?

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah, I guess I’m missing the point. You said only high value cases get lawyers, and I just knew that to not be true, and so that’s what I said. Yeah, are people with 50/50 cases getting representation? Probably not. I certainly see enough pro se plaintiffs though, and from my perspective I understand why they can’t find lawyers.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        valid points.

        my neighbor is a public defender and chronically overworked. all I know is she doesn’t get the low-hanging fruit and profitable cases, she gets to defend those who can’t afford representation - but crucially - only because it’s criminal, not civil. I look at all the cases decided by civil law where people have to seek legal aide because they can’t afford representation and weep.