• Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      So is executing unarmed people in the street but that seems to be where the calvinball game is at.

        • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          This is for when they come to your house. At that point your best case scenario is that you’re dragged perfectly healthy to a concentration camp.

          • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Right. But the chance that your booby trap is discovered by the law without it blowing up is way higher than it serving it’s purpose as an uno reverse against ICE.

            So rather than going to prison for no reason, I say take the fight to them!

    • redsand@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Probably in most jurisdictions but maybe not if you shoot it yourself. Then it goes from being a trap to a remote controlled weapon.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Any sort of trap is illegal, for good reason.

      Although tannerite is stable unless you shoot it with a round going over 2000ft/s

      • _stranger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        What if you hung a sign in your house stating “This is my tannerite storage mannequin, do not shoot him”?

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m pretty sure it would still be illegal. The logic behind traps being illegal is that they harm indiscriminately. And in the case of explosives they have the potential to harm more than just the person who triggered the trap.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Extremely, there are explicit laws against booby trapping your own property and you can face full prosecution even if it harms only burglars.

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        If Boris is being shot and explodes, the likelihood of the home owner already being killed by ICE or other agents is pretty high.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Gotta ask though, if it needs to be shot to go off, is that really a booby trap? I have draino in my house, that isn’t a trap. Maybe you have to put a sign on it saying don’t shoot?

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          It would absolutely, 100% go to trial, and the prosecution could easily prove an intent to harm.

          As much as the Better Call Saul kinds of legal arguments look clever on TV, in reality the law is much more about vibes and how people interpret what happened.

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I just wonder where the line is. Is it intent to harm. So if say the thing was a gift, and they didn’t know it was explosive. Would that absolve the person of guilt. Maybe it goes to manslaughter in that case?

            • ameancow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              There are a lot of serious laws in the US about owning, transporting and storing explosives (thank you Anarchist bomber movement last century) as well as requirements for permits and the like, so you would have to prove it was a “gift” and not intended to be used for anything, but even then you would not only face negligence charges/manslaughter if someone was killed, but also various kinds of “aggravated” charges related to public safety. I am not a lawyer but I have a feeling the prosecution would make a pretty heavy case to make an example.