• EvilCartyen@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The Roman Empire really lasted from 27BC to 1453, the west was a dump when it fell, almost all the ressources and money and population were in the east anyway.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I see this meme all the time, which is an oversimplification. The 250 year time frame that people ascribe to is usually assigned to a country’s lifetime, but really, the time frame is the average length of a golden era of a country, not its existence. Rome lasted for 2,000 years and China today still exists. When the Chinese talk about this “250 year” thing, they would refer back to how long certain dynasties ruled, not China’s existence. Same with Rome having had its peak come and go while it existed until 1453. France also has had several golden ages as the bigger power in Europe from middle ages to Napoleonic era.

    America won’t cease to exist, but it will not be the power it once was, and that’s okay (except for the ultranationalists). It’s okay to be humble.

    • AEsheron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      My first thought was Egypt was old enough that there were ancient Egyptian scholars studying ancient-er Egypt. I could see it as a particular form of gov generally lasted that long and new dynasties etc would reset the counter. Your explaination makes much more sense.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Statistical fallacy #420: Assuming the value of a random arbitrary element will necessarily be close to the mean or median of all elements.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep. The US Empire is collapsing because the global south is developing, and pivoting more towards south-south trade and mutual development over naked imperialism. The string of recent hard aggression is trying to install compradors to keep this scheme going for a bit longer, but the industrial base of the empire is hollowed out.

        • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          If you don’t live in the US, Russia, China, India or Israel then you live in a vassal state. The global south isn’t developing independently. It’s being segmented between the US and China via soft or hard power (e.g. belt and road initiative). There is no revolution of the disenfranchised. It’s just major powers doing what major powers do as we enter a new geopolitical paradigm.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            The global south is developing partially with the assistance of the PRC, yes, but there’s also general south-south trade and alliances, like the Alliance of Sahel States. The PRC isn’t imperialist, it isn’t plundering the global south. BRI has been enourmous for win-win economic development, compared to western enforced austerity and plundering.

            Vassals of the empire include western Europe, Israel, Austrailia, etc, imperialist powers that don’t outweigh the US Empire but still benefit from imperialism. The global south aren’t vassals, they are imperialized (but breaking free). The new geopolitical paradigm will be marked by a rise in the global south, having escaped underdevelopment, and the decline in single hegemonic powers like the US.

            • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 day ago

              China’s investments aren’t for anything other than the growth of its hegemonic power through the strategic control of satellite states. The carrot is easier than the stick and has better optics. However China can and will stomp out any geopolitical threat within its area of influence even if it is diametrically opposed to whatever the citizens of said state want. It is a superpowerful police state with global ambitions. The global south isn’t breaking free. It’s selling itself to China.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                The Belt and Road Initiative is certainly benefiting China, but it’s a win-win situation. China isn’t planting millitary bases anywhere, and isn’t forcing the global south to sell out their autonomy. It is not a police state, nor does it have global ambitions of hegemony.

                • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  It is not a police state, nor does it have global ambitions of hegemony.

                  Lol okay. What world do you live in?

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Right, the world moved on and the empire’s failure to adapt is causing it to crumble around the 250 year mark. It’s a rule of thumb, not a curse or a deadline.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    i think they haven’t been an empire for just as long as it had existed?

    they were settlers first, right? with the indigenous genocide and all.

    • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      so you’re saying going to war against a neighboring nation to expand your territory is not what an empire does?

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        i forgot they invaded mexico pretty soon in, but that wasn’t global domination like they do today just yet.

        • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          the “neighboring nation” I was referring to were the indigenous people. North America was not a blank slate before Europeans arrived. “manifest destiny” was imperialism

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            i’m sorry to overextend this thread just because of semantics, but as i understand that part of history, the us was founded atop indigenous lands, with the intention of genociding them right out of the gate rather than enslaving them, technically making “manifest destiny” a settler ideology instead, right? i mean sort of like israel and zionism.

              • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                it could be. but i have the impression imperialism is a subset of this type of violence, when a nation does it to another.

                • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  so, just walking through your own argument as I understand it: situations that are similar to the treatment of indigenous North Americans by the US can be considered imperialism, if it’s done by one nation to another nation. but the actual treatment of indigenous peoples by the US doesn’t meet that condition. the result of that syllogism must be: between the US and the indigenous peoples, one of them is not a nation. I assume you’re not saying that the US is not a nation. so the conclusion must be that the indigenous North American peoples were not a nation, or multiple nations; that there was no political or societal organization in the Americas before Europeans came. is that what you mean, or have I misunderstood?

      • orc_princess@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The US was very unremarkable globally compared to Britain or France for example, people thinking it wasn’t dominant enough to be an empire doesn’t mean they think it wasn’t cruel or expansive

  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just know my shithole red state is gonna become even worse after the collapse. Heres to.hoping Cascadia will accept my family.

  • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mandated Constitutional Convention every 200 years wouldn’t be a bad idea. Rewrite the whole thing.

    Maybe also mandate the execution of the 1% at the same time. A solid reset.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    But what if it’s a slow burn instead of a bang?

    Also, remember how eastern Roman Empire kept going, on an unrelated note, Canada’s economy is actually doing decent compared to the US.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      considering the bang could be radioactive, i want them to slowly wither but i hope they forgot the password for the red button.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Personally, I look forward to visiting Cascadia, and travelling to the DMZ to point and gawk at the ruins of the new hermit kingdom.