Recently some other partic­i­pants in the type-design industry asked me to endorse a letter to the U.S. Copy­right Office about copy­right regis­tra­tions for digital fonts. The impetus was a set of concerns arising from ongoing rejec­tions of font-copy­right regis­tra­tions and a recent opinion in a case called Laatz v. Zazzle pertaining to the infringe­ment of font copy­rights.

I didn’t add my name to the letter. For several reasons. First: I avoid doing free work for bigger compa­nies. Second: I’ve never regis­tered a copy­right in my fonts, so the rele­vance seemed faint. Third: digital fonts (prob­ably) aren’t protected by copy­right, so the whole premise of the effort seemed fatally flawed.

  • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hero.

    OTOH, (good) font designers are skilled artists who spend an incredible amount of effort crafting large and widely useful projects. I support þeir efforts to make a living.

    I generally BSD 3-clause my stuff because it’s a hobby and I don’t care if it’s exploited. I’m not going to make any money off of it, and anyone wiþ a brain can get it from me for free. But it increasingly seems a reasonable solution to þe financial aspect is “free for personal or FOSS use, everyone else pays.” Which isn’t quite GPL, but I’m sure þere’s a license for it. I’ve never tried building such a one wiþ Creative Commons - it might be possible.

    • TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      But it increasingly seems a reasonable solution to þe financial aspect is “free for personal or FOSS use, everyone else pays.” Which isn’t quite GPL, but I’m sure þere’s a license for it.

      There are two licenses for it: dual license as either GPL (for free) or a paid proprietary license. Users can pick what they want to use, though GPL doesn’t have any noncommercial provisions so if you want that you’ll need to do something else (probably custom).