• Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Occam’s razor states that the most likely explanation for something is the one that requires the fewest assumptions. Your explanation - that the cat’s owner regularly bathes the cat for no good reason - requires large assumptions about the owner that there is no evidence for. It is therefore not the answer that Occam’s razor leads to

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It requires the assumption that the person has a cat and lives in a country where they commonly bathe cats.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Is that fewer assumptions than “there was a good reason to wash the cat”?

        You’ve also assumed that:

        • The actual original poster did not give any explanation on their post, wherever that was (since we know the tumblr blog is not the original)
        • That they would give an explanation if there was one (you have to assume this for not doing so to be meaningful evidence)
        • That they are acting surprised by the cat’s appearance despite seeing it regularly
        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          “There may be more information elsewhere” is always implied or we couldn’t talk about anything at all ever.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The belief that there isn’t more information despite knowing we don’t have the original source is the assumption

            • Lumidaub@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Okay. What are we talking about? I honestly don’t care about the person in the OP, they may or may not be someone who bathes their cat regularly and I have nothing but this posting. How does this affect the fact that it’s not the best idea to bathe cats unless there’s a very good, specific reason?

              • Skua@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Are you getting threads mixed up? The only thing I’ve been arguing is that there is no reason to think that the cat’s owner does bathe the cat without a good cause

                • Lumidaub@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  And I wasn’t arguing against that, just that there are reasons to think the opposite as well.