Sure but if you don’t have anything to base your prediction on, as in this case, what’s the point? There’s nothing to discuss because it’s all either doomsday scenarios or random fantasy.

Okay. Still, can I see that track record, please?

His track record speaks for itself

Anywhere to examine that track record?

The days on this Earth are numbered, and they will never reach 10.000.

I’m fairly certain I have been on this Earth longer than 10,000 days.

There is no way you could’ve extrapolated today’s world from shortly after the last ice age, you cannot extrapolate 10.000 years into the future from now, ESPECIALLY since progress (in every area) has accelerated to unprecedented speeds.

Bot posting AI output for… reasons (?). Looked like they’d given up for a while but apparently they’re back.

Naturally, that goes without saying.

There are certain irregularities in the lineart that I wouldn’t expect from a human artist, but that’s not hard proof. It’s more the overall style and the font. And of course the fact that I don’t think someone who can draw on this level would break the 180 rule (as explained above) and also change the colour of the sky for no reason, as if they weren’t aware that these two panels are meant to be continuous.

One of the most important rules of film-making also applies to cartoons: don’t make characters randomly switch sides frame to frame. But of course an AI wouldn’t know that.

Masking.

Sure. Now what?

Oh gawd women are criminals aren’t they?

If every man is a king, no man is a king. What would that even mean? Everyone just do as they please? Send your armies made of other (lesser?) kings who inexplicably follow your orders to attack the lands of other kings who themselves defend their property by throwing hordes of lesser kings at your kings?

Or is that what the last sentence is about? As soon as your lands are under attack by criminals you’re no longer a king? Then what? Do you go pleading to the surrounding kings to please form an army to defend you and help you get back to kinghood?

Also, those criminals attacking a king’s house and making him not a king, they are kings thenselves, remember? Doesn’t that legitimise their actions since kings can do as they please?

Don’t worry about me overthinking this braincells eating bullshit, it’s okay, I have beer in my near future, that’ll surely restore them.

I’m going to assume you’re not talking to me specifically when you say “you”.

Now explain to OP how society has survived for millennia.

It’s still THERE, every morning when you wake up.

He knows that and is asking how people operate who do believe in strict gender roles.

Cool, you seem very invested in this woman who was free to have sex with two (or more!) different men without anyone needing to shame her for it.

“They might do something about it” is just as bad an argument. So what if they find a way? At the very least they’d have to allocate resources to that.

(I’m not advocating for this technology in particular, because of the aforementioned accessibility issues - just speaking in general)

I figured it would fuck up accessibility but I strongly disagree with your second point. Obviously any measure against (or for) anything is useless if only a few people do it, that’s not an argument against adoption but for finding better ways to promote it.

I don’t think it liked that.