Google on Wednesday began inviting Gemini users to let its chatbot read their Gmail, Photos, Search history, and YouTube data in exchange for possibly more personalized responses.

Josh Woodward, VP of Google Labs, Gemini and AI Studio, announced the beta availability of Personal Intelligence in the US. Access will roll out over the next week to US-based Google AI Pro and AI Ultra subscribers.

  • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There’s a lot of people claiming “no one wants this”.

    Thing is, people loved this when they introduced it with Google Now back in 2012. They literally used to trawl your inbox and tell you when to expect packages, when you had appointments, when your flight and hotel were booked for/when to leave for the airport.

    All of that was useful information and it was free. Later their assistant could call to book you a table at a restaurant or add things to your shopping list or whatever. Some of this functionality started off very clunky, but it could absolutely be useful. But slowly but surely people started realizing that they were the product and that in order for Google Now and assistant to do this stuff it had to be reading emails and processing information in the cloud. We didn’t have devices that could do that kind of processing on phone.

    After backlash (and likely because it wasn’t making them any money because they hadn’t figured out how to monetize the product yet), Google got rid of Google Now and Google Assistant took over.

    it did some of the same things but distracted users from what was missing with flashy new hardware and smart home things. Lots of people loved that stuff too.

    Then Sonos sued and forced them to kneecap their products.Suddenly the honeymoon was over in a big way. Some of the most basic smart home features were broken and in such a way that people who used them were irate.

    Some of those integrations and functionality returned eventually. But right in the middle of that Google launched Gemini and it sucked at most all of it. It keeps getting “better” supposedly. But for a.lot of smart home users the magic has been lost. they want what they had and lost and Gemini isn’t even a reasonable facsimile of that.

    So it’s more that people are frustrated with Gemini and angry at Google for killing another service they found useful.

    People still want technology to make their lives easier and more efficient. But they also want privacy and for things to just work. Google hasn’t made a product that just worked in a long time and AI isn’t going to be it.

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Mates, I’m positively effusive about AI compared to your average Lemmster. But I can’t for the life of me figure out why I would want personalized AI any more than I want personalized ads. Which is zero — that’s the amount of corporate-personalized shit I want in my life.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I would be ok with it being like a person, more like an acquaintance at work maybe. Specifically meaning I would be ok with having the AI know about me only based on what I’ve said to it.

      But none of this surveillance economy stuff. And the AI model can be no snitch to big ad tech.

      • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I’m sure that’ll be a tiered pay option soon enough. $10 a month gets you an ai that’s just an acquaintance. Doesn’t “care”, forgets your name sometimes, doesn’t remember that thing you talked about last week. $50 a month gets you your ai best friend. It “cares”, remembers everything about you, makes suggestions based on what it knows about you, even goes out of it’s way to prompt you first and ask you how your dentist appt went.

        In my opinion ai is in the “drug dealer wandering around the club giving a free bump” phase. Once people get addicted and sew it into the fabric of every day life, these companies will up the price, make the cheaper tiers too frustrating to use, and charge up the ass. “Oh, you’ve got an ai boyfriend? Let’s see how much you’ll pay to keep it or have it lobotomized.”

      • setsubyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Even that is just confusing. I sometimes use Perplexity (because Pro comes with my bank account - neobanks have zero focus). And by default it remembers things you say. So when I ask a question sometimes it will randomly decide to bring in something else I asked about before. E.g. I sometimes use it to look up programming related stuff, and then when I ask something else it will randomly research whatever language it thinks I like now in that context too and do things like suggest an anime based on my recent interest in Rust for no good reason.

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          That’s true, these supposedly intelligent systems are really stupid about this stuff still. Especially with limited room to store that additional ever growing context about you.

          I wasn’t accounting for quality, and it’s bad right now for this. And I’m skeptical it will get better. The models need to be tactful about using accumulated knowledge about the person driving.

          I can’t help but feel my descriptions getting more and more similar to just describing a competent person. And, I’m aware I’m being idealistic and what I’m OK with won’t be a product any time soon.

          I guess it would be fully on device, encrypted at rest and have a perfectly good memory of our conversations and it would be tactful in bringing in knowledge into conversations. I dunno, I’m just describing the ideal personal assistant AI. And many people would make it a companion. And… yeah, anyway. Surveillance capitalism and pervasive advertising is bad.

  • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    They are already doing it right now. If you don’t want them to train in your data, you have to turn off history.

    If you turn off history, suddenly all integrations, also on your phone, don’t work anymore. Like creating reminders or the shopping list integration etc.

    I just want Google Assistant back.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No one wants this at all.

    They have been shoveling Gemini into all the smart speakers and Android Auto. Gemini can’t get anything correct.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I was reluctant to “upgrade”, but since that was forced, I’ve been using my smart speakers a lot more. Gemini can be helpful and (fairly–make sure your can sanity check) accurate.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s always going to sound accurate. That’s what’s it’s built to do. It’s just that often the easiest way to sound accurate is to be accurate, but not always. Shortly after you forget that it’s going to fuck you.

        Better not forget.

  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “More personalised responses” means more finely tuned to influence your behaviour, not “smarter answers”

  • Cybersteel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The trick that they don’t tell you is that you don’t own your soul, it belongs to god while the body is owned by the state. It’s a reason why in most places suicide is a crime, you’re damaging the state’s property.

  • LostWanderer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Eww, that’s the worse trade that one could possibly do. ROFL Given how much of a fail “AI” is at the moment, they could never deliver anything substantial with such a trade.

  • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No one wants personalized answers. They want smart answers, like what was promised: talking to a professor. The promise of AI was to help me look smart on the internet. I’m a dumbass, why would I want you to tell me more dumbass things?

  • Kanda@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Don’t they already have this if you’re a Google user? Just update the terms and conditions that nobody reads

  • Disgruntled@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Josh Woodward (Musician)

    For a minute there I thought it was THIS Josh Woodward. I remember years ago he had long hair and YouTube made him cut his hair to be some special content creator that they were offering back then.