Why YSK: if you don’t have the ability or time to devote your visual attention to reading, you can still engage your mind the same way as you do while reading by listening to an audiobook. Virtually any modern audiobook player will also let you select the play speed, so you can listen to books at whatever rate you’re comfortable with.

Personally I know as I’ve gotten older the number of hours I’m physically able to read tends to no longer be able to match my desire to read, so it’s nice to be able to keep going even if my eyes are sore.

Historically, this is somewhat analogous to the late 19th century lectors that worked in some factories, paid by donated workers’ wages, to read/perform popular books for bored workers. Predictably in the US factory owners tended to have a problem with their workers listening to ‘communist literature,’ leading to firings, strikes, and violent crackdowns.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Yes as it turns out both text and audiobooks contain this “language” thing.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Movies also have this “language” thing. It distinguishes audio books as much closer to reading than a movie is, despite all 3 conveying the same content.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Movies still do it too just much less because they’re engineered to be easy to watch.