For more than a decade, the United States has faced a relentless and heartbreaking increase in fatal drug overdoses driven by synthetic opioids. A new analysis suggests this trend has suddenly reversed due to a major disruption in the global supply chain of illicit fentanyl. Published in Science, the study indicates that regulatory actions taken by the Chinese government, following high-level diplomatic engagement with the Biden administration, may be the primary driver behind this unexpected decline in mortality.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The US could have also taken the Sackler family out to sea and disappeared them, but we didn’t. I think that would have been an appropriate punishment (if a little too lenient) for engineering a nationwide addiction crisis.

    But your point stands.

    The American brand is permanently tarnished, and it’s going to be a bummer to see the consequences unfold in the coming years.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s wild because in China they would have done exactly that. Well, they tend to be more efficient with corporate criminals than charter a whole damn boat. A brick wall and a revolver is the normal way enemies of the people meet their end. (When they haven’t cut the leadership in enough at least in some cases.)

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Idk I say we should’ve just given them a taste of their own medicine, but only like a week’s taste, then strip their wealth.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s wild to think that with the same amount of power Obama and Biden had, that Donald has completely rearranged the landscape of American politics, and once the post-tariff trade agreements kick in (rerouting supply chains around rather than through the US) and the BBB puts the kill shot on the poor and middle class, I think that the next year or two will be a clear historical demarcation line.

        • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’m not sure about that. This presidency is more than 50 years in the making, involved a stolen vote, multiple billionaire co-conspirators, even Obama was like “how do we stop this??” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnhBrVb_aaw

          They have all the authors of p25 behind them, the house, the senate, the judiciary, the POTUS, the whole shootin’ match.

            • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              We need to have a viable plan for when he cancels elections. I don’t know how to make such a plan, but we need it yesterday.

              • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Personally, I don’t think it’s going to end up being logistically possible for Donald’s government to do that, owing to elections being run at the state level instead of federal. I am sure they will identify a few key races and counties and attempt to intimidate voters though.

                Even with his Gestapo, he can’t even control a handful of major cities.

                • nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Door to door raids are the vote cancelation.

                  They’ll start taking whoever they want on a large scale now that it’s been tried and warmed up on darker-than-paper-bag.

                  I mean. Unless the militarized offices are deactivated.

                  Maybe American Spring should start good and earlybwith the climate change weather.

                  We could start rebuilding civil inferstructure before our monocropping pays us in famine.

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Did Biden ever have a majority in both houses? I know Obama had it for the first two years and that’s how he got Obamacare through. Neither of them had SCOTUS stacked in their favour and ruling them immune from their own intervention.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The American brand is permanently tarnished

      I wish this were true. But after Iraq? After Vietnam? A Cold War that nearly wiped out the entire human race? After CIA sponsored coups from Brazil to Guatamala? Henry Ford was passing out copies of “The International Jew” all over Germany during the 1920s. Roosevelt forced the Platt Amendment down Cuba’s throat. McKinley oversaw a genocide in the Philippines. Polk gave us the Annexation of Texas and the revitalization of the North American slave trade. Anyone ask Andrew Jackson what happened to all the Cherokee down in Florida?

      America is a country with unlimited do-overs. Our brand is never tarnished. We are always and forever a Shining City On A Hill even as Ronnie fucking Raygun is sponsoring nun rape down in Nicaragua.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        The events you’re describing are the history of every major world power. The global power that hasn’t participated in numerous atrocities does not exist.

        The difference here is the loss of domestic rule of law and its cascading downstream effects for global cooperation and trade, which yes, will create significant future problems for the US and its brand. This will become more evident in a year to a year-and-a-half when the post-tariff trade agreements take effect, for a start. China is the obvious beneficiary.

        But could get a whole lot worse a whole lot faster depending on how far Donald decides to push his unilateral warmongering, and whether or not Congress does anything about it.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The global power that hasn’t participated in numerous atrocities does not exist.

          Almost as though power is accrued at the expense of the vulnerable.

          The difference here is the loss of domestic law and order and its cascading downstream effects for global cooperation and trade

          The only countries that the US has alienated are ones it is explicitly sanctioning. Nobody else is actually cutting ties.

          China is the obvious beneficiary.

          China’s the trade-alternative for countries under US sanctions, precisely because Trump’s done a ham-fisted job of diplomacizing with his counterparts overseas. But a future Pete Buttigieg administration can patch that up if he chooses. There is more to be gained by doing business with the US than with Venezuela or Iran or Cuba. Chinese leaders know that and act accordingly.

          But could get a whole lot worse a whole lot faster

          Sure. Or it could come to a grinding halt if Trump loses control of Congress and falls into lame duck status three years early. Already, we’re seeing sharp divides even inside the GOP, which already operates on thin margins in the face of a Dem election wave.

          Plenty of precedent for an unpopular President to get sidelined by skilled and ambitious legislators. And the US has demonstrated time and time again that it has the manpower and the infrastructure to rebound quickly under strong, competent leadership.

          We’re almost certainly going to face a nasty recession going into the next few years. But we’re still a massive, hugely populated, highly technical, heavily industrialized economy. Losing unipolar status isn’t the end of the empire. A bad few years of economic contraction isn’t the end of the world.

          Now… the long tail of climate change… that’s another story. If the Colorado River dries up before it reaches Arizona, we’re going to see some shit flying.

          • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            And the US has demonstrated time and time again that it has the manpower and the infrastructure to rebound quickly under strong, competent leadership.

            A lot of the manpower has been sacked. Replacing those people and getting them to a point of strong competency will take years and years and a lot of money.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        There might be a difference now. The US has always warmongered, but it did know who it could gonafter without consequences. Geopolitically, Vietnam, Iraq, and all these other countries hardly mattered. These could be attacked and nobody would lift a finger to stop it.

        Greenland would be different. That would damage the relationship with its European allies a lot. A relationship the USA has depended on for a long time.