There is no evidence these two didn’t know each other when the picture was taken OR they even got married.

But these dullards upvote and comment how beautiful life is.

Fucking idiots.

I guess this is a break from a random kitten picture and the subject “I found this little guy nailed to a tree and half eaten by goats. New he’s my best friend.”

  • Microw@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    This wasn’t a reddit post originally, it was posted on Chinese social media and the husband was subsequently interviewed by Chinese media. It is a well documented case.

    Bored panda article

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Look at these gullible fucking idiots finding beauty in life. What absolute buffoons.”

    I mean, c’mon man. Who fuck cares. It makes people smile and hurts no one. Not everyone needs to miserable as you.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’re right. There’s no way two people could have appeared in the same photograph years before they met. What dumbasses all the normies upvoting that post must be!

    • IndridCold@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sure. Feel free to believe trite internet bullshit without proof. I’m sure that will go well for you.

  • breadleyloafsyou@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    haha haven’t seen that pic in a while. i used to be a gullible idiot posting on reddit. now i’m a gullible idiot posting on lemmy

  • wabasso@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even if the claim is true, it does make you think. How do we trust historical records as we move into the future? The tech to fake things is advancing. Is a counteracting tech available, or is this a lopsided problem?

    • yukijoou@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      we need to have trusted sources, and provide sources for pictures and video the same way we’ve been sourcing claims

      it doesn’t matter if there’s “a picture” of something, it only matters if it’s “a picture taken by [specialist] published by [specialist institution]”

  • Ixoid@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was trying to find the issue with this post, why it was receiving downvotes. The only flaw I could discern is that the two photos appear to be taken from exactly the same position (based on the interesting angles of the background sculpture), not 20 degrees apart if we’re to believe both people are in both images.