I can’t agree on this. For one, proving the negative would apply for infinite cases. That’s not useful. It’s worse than wrong; it’s not even wrong. Second, most would agree that ghosts are supernatural. By definition if it exists it must be natural, and thus can be studied and understood.
I can’t agree on this. For one, proving the negative would apply for infinite cases. That’s not useful. It’s worse than wrong; it’s not even wrong. Second, most would agree that ghosts are supernatural. By definition if it exists it must be natural, and thus can be studied and understood.