• PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The AI cost of water isn’t really a big deal in comparison to the consumption of water through crops and other means worldwide.

    I heard the cost of water for AI worldwide is 1/80 the water consumption of corn in America alone.

    What is a big deal is the money invested towards it is holding up our economy, (when it could be spent on making society better) creating fake news and impersonating humans at a rapid rate.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Also, the machine costs $500B/year to operate and generates less than $2B in gross revenue. So John Shareholder is going to need a multi-trillion dollar bailout in a year or two.

      • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I love big tech’s products after the startup funding designed to kill competition has been spent. It’s really the sweet spot where the product doesn’t function efficiently anymore AND it costs more than the original product or service it replaced AND any human workers involved are not protected as employees.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      It’s not even profitable though… At this point it seems it is just about control, like they would rather have a money pit then let independent workers, ie creatives, have any profit.

  • emirbutdumb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    i dont hate ai it but should be limited AND MODERATED. WDYM İ CAN MANİPULATE A BOT AND ASK FOR A BOMB RECİPE FOR A “fiction”

    • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      it’s more of a tool that can read all the books at once, but it also doesn’t know how to judge its contents, so the user will still need to judge what it said themselves and not blindly trust it. (You can also find books about making the same bombs)

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I think ai can be useful and beneficial to the world if used correctly. This is not possible within the capitalist system however.

  • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yeah, I think objectively the “A.I.'s” are kind of neat, like those old desktop pal cats kinda of neat, cost almost nothing to run. But A.I. costs such an extreme ammount of resources to run enitre cities could be run in its deficits alone. We do not have the energy, water, or computers to run it, but something is bankrolling it.

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Person of the Year is not an endorsement of their practices, it’s really just whoever dominated the news cycle that year. Both Hitler and Stalin have been Person of the Year. Sometimes it’s not even people, like “The Computer” in 1982.

  • ReCursing@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You know, if you don’t massively and stupidly exaggerate, it’s not evil!

    • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I mean already is given the estimates we have for power and water use, not to mention the way it is being used it is blatantly “evil” yes.