Should such a clause not be added as standard today, similar to the “salvatory clause,” provided that the content is not intended for the widest possible distribution?
Should such a clause not be added as standard today, similar to the “salvatory clause,” provided that the content is not intended for the widest possible distribution?
Somebody already told you this is redundant. It doesn’t ‘create additional leverage’. Copyright law exists and by default grants you all these privileges. Ignorance of the law doesn’t allow someone to break it.
The problem is even if you live in a communist utopia, a lawsuit still costs time and headaches. That is the real question. Are you willing to go to court to enforce your rights? If yes, then that’s all you need to do, because you’re already the rights owner.