ickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoDiabolicallemmy.worldimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up11.03Karrow-down17
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageDiabolicallemmy.worldickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squarevillage604@adultswim.fanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 day agoThen that snippet wouldn’t be admissible in court.
minus-squarevateso5074@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·edit-217 hours agodeleted by creator
minus-squareVerat@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·23 hours agoIf the prosecution obtains it as evidence, I would think evidence handling procedure would make said discarding a no-go.
minus-squarevateso5074@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·edit-217 hours agodeleted by creator
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·18 hours agoHow many things will you make up to avoid just being wrong? You should try AI. It’s pretty good at telling you what you want to hear.
Then that snippet wouldn’t be admissible in court.
deleted by creator
If the prosecution obtains it as evidence, I would think evidence handling procedure would make said discarding a no-go.
deleted by creator
How many things will you make up to avoid just being wrong?
You should try AI. It’s pretty good at telling you what you want to hear.
deleted by creator