There was (and still somewhat is) a big uproar about auto tune usage in music. But guess what? You haven’t heard a song NOT using it since at least 1998. Unless youre friends with every sound engineer out there and can ask them specifically if an artist did or did not use it (unrealistic).

The same will happen with ai. People wont notice, and it will go on to be the norm, with a very small pocket of purists.

ITT: People are really butthurt that their favorite artist uses autotune/pitch correction, and they have no idea how mixing and production work. These will be the same people listening to ai music in 5 years with no knowledge of it. So my prediction is correct.

  • chosensilence@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    i don’t think so. autotune does not make a bad singer good or otherwise generate new content from existing material. every artist uses a variant of autotune, but it is an editing tool, not a replacement for skill.

    • JettisonJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Pitch correction totally is a replacement for the specific skill of singing on key, though. While it’s not the only skill that goes into singing, it’s one that society used to admire in a good singer. Pitch correction also removes many small deviations in pitch that may have been appreciated by listeners as part of the artist’s performance. Just because everyone’s doing it now doesn’t mean something subtle and real hasn’t been lost.

      • chosensilence@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        you’re not wrong truly it’s about how you look at what is being created. a lot of studio albums are polished because they want to represent the artist’s closest vision. it isn’t necessarily about being raw, that’s for Live. they want to make the song they know is there in the exact way they hear it. pitch correct will not take somebody who is truly bad and make them sound good because the worse they are the more the effect has to be adjusted. it becomes really obvious and you’ll hear sharp corrections.

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      autotune does not make a bad singer good

      This is precisely what autotune DOES. You’re confusing the creative usage of autotune to create a specific sound, like what T-Pain (an actually great signer) popularized. But autotune wasn’t created for that, it was specifically created for correcting signers who can’t keep a key.

      • chosensilence@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        …yes, i know what Melodyne is thanks lol. it still cannot do that. it will be incredibly bad sounding and obvious if the singer isn’t able to sing on key consistently enough and the errors aren’t minimal.

        • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          With the amount of editing possible, I have to say thats inaccurate. You can take a mostly crap singer and make them unbelievably good.

          • chosensilence@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            i’m sorry but i am a musician and know producers and this doesn’t pass the smell test. what you think of as crap may be decent lol.

            • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              That may be, im pretty forgiving of most singers really because it is hard. I see why they use the tools. But there is a MASSIVE amount of editing in your average song today.