• xbloodymajor@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    5 hours ago

    No idea why he thinks anyone will side with him on this. At least the 30% cut thing had some reason behind it no matter how thin.

    • marighost@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The only people who will side with him are c-suite dipshits protecting corporate interests and AI/Tech bros lacking a grip on reality. Fuck you, Sweeney, you piece of shit.

      • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Back when metaverse was the hot shit bubble, he was bragging how fortnite is the metaverse and was clearly the future.

        Funny, not a single techbro vould meaningfully distinguish games from the metaverse.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m generally pro-AI but I still think the disclosure is nice to have and should not be removed.

        People have a right to informed decisions. If they want a product that had “no AI” in its making (although let’s be honest, a game might not contain AI generated audiovisual assets, but a form of AI, even generative AI, is almost guaranteed to have been used during the creation of the game), they can vote with their wallets.