With the UK apparently floating ideas of a VPN ban it’s got me worried about the future of anonymity online. Now people have already pointed out that a VPN ban doesn’t make sense because of all the legitimate uses of one and wouldn’t even be enforceable anyway, but that got me thinking.

What if governments ordered websites (such as social media sites) to block traffic originating from a VPN node? Lots of sites already do this (or restrict your activity if they detect a VPN) to mitigate spam etc. and technically that wouldn’t interfere with “legitimate” (in the eyes of the gov) VPN usage like logging onto corporate networks remotely

It’s already a pain with so many sites either blocking you from access or making you jump through a million captchas using VPNs now. I’m worried it’s about to get a whole lot worse

  • eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    You can always just route your traffic through a roll your own tunnel to some cheap cloud VM. Modern automation makes it even painless.

  • chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I have moments when I think “I might get banned for this”, this is one of those moments.

    You may try to ban vpns but you can not really, people usually find ways around censorship. We are notorious for this stuff, as a species.

    Its infuriating to me when people just roll over for the powers that be. They may ban some nodes, others will pop up, those will get banned too and so the cycle of cat and mouse begins.

    You can host your own vpn with wireguard. It takes a bit of figuring out, sure, but you can literally do so with a raspberry pi. Stick it in a network of choice and voila.

    Oh they may control stuff, but this is not a game that can be won, human repression is a futile effort, it may work for a while, but there is a reason why regimes fall. See the wall of Berlin and so many other examples.

    Fret not friend, for hope dies last.

  • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Anything can be made illegal. Enforcement is tricky. At the moment it is very easy to block Wireguard protocol at the ISP level, some even do it. But that would probably push Wireguard and others to invest more in obfuscation.

    As a sidenote, it bugs me that Wireguard does not support obfuscation out of the box, and you have to put it on top of wireguard.

  • bl4kers@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That would severely cripple remote work/collaboration, which is essential for all megacorps. Unless there’s some sort of carve out for that I don’t see it happening

  • James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s theoretically possible but difficult to actually do. China has a large central government and surveillance state, VPNs are essentially banned there, and yet a large percentage of the population uses them daily to the point where it’s commonplace.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If China can’t do it then nobody can. I’ll only be worried if China manages to successfully block out VPN use in their country.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Snowflake or steganographic comunication, works even in North Corea, encrypted messages are not a solution, because they always cause suspicion in countries with strong surveillance and censorship. VPN are not the solution either, even in occidental coutries, there are a lot of webs which are not accesible with a VPN or Proxy, mostly streaming sites, eg. Rakuten and others.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    How can you ban a VPN (virtual private network)?

    I have a VPN setup at home and at my parents home, I can connect either as if I was at either location physically. My office has VPNs for connecting between offices and connecting from remote locations. And dont get me started about being and to purchase a VPS in any country you want, and run a VPN on it.

    Does this mean people and companies can no longer setup their own VPN’s.

    If this is about privacy and anonymity, evey bowsers on any device has a unique identifying fingerprint that allows it to be identifiable even using a VPN. So what is this ban even targeting?

    The Hidden Tracking Method Your VPN Can’t Block - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJOpHSPkWMo

    • ISOmorph@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      So what is this ban even targeting?

      UK is one of the forerunners in regard to online ID checks, for example for porn sites. Brits now regularly use VPNs to escape those checks