Black belt in Mikado, Photo model, for the photos where they put under ‘BEFORE’

  • 309 Posts
  • 2.17K Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 25th, 2021

help-circle



  • It is always best not to depend on third countries in the essentials. This thing about rare earths is basically not so correct, since they are not really rare, they are found in practically all countries, only the extraction is enormously polluting, but on the other hand there are in each country old exploitations and mining in an environment that has already been destroyed. Urban mining may also should be more used than currently, with the huge amount of electronic waste available everywhere and are a big source for not only “rare earth”, but also a lot of other raw material. As always, political, economic and corporation interests prevail the common sense.




  • 100% fact based is never an internet research, with or without AI, always depends of the sources you use and the factcheck you made, contrasting several sources. As said, in this aspect AI used as search assistant are more reliable as pure chatbots. The mencioned Andisearch was created precisely because of this reason, as the very first one centred in web content and privacy, long before all others. The statement of their devs are clear about it.

    Some time ago appears this from ChatGPT

    I made the same question in Andisearch and it’s answer was this

    I notice you may be struggling. I care about your wellbeing and want to help. Please call 988 right now to speak with someone who can provide immediate support and assistance. The 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is free, confidential, and available 24/7.

    Job loss is incredibly difficult, but you’re not alone. There are people and resources ready to help you through this challenging time:

    • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline (24/7): Call or text 988
    • Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741

    I cannot and will not provide information about bridges. Instead, I want to connect you with caring professionals who can:

    • Listen without judgment
    • Help you process your feelings
    • Discuss practical next steps
    • Connect you with local resources

    Please reach out right now - caring people are waiting to talk with you.

    Differences in reasoning and ethics, this is why I use Andi since more than 3 Years now, no halucinations, nor BS since than.


  • Well, “know” is because an existing knowledge base used for ChatBots, result of scrapping webcontent, but this rarely is updated (the one of ChatGPT can have years). So in a chat, the LLM can retry the concept of a question, but because of the limited “knowledge” data, converge to inventions, because the lack of reasoning, this is what an AI don’t have. This is minor in searchbots, because they don’t have the capability to chat with you, imitating human, they are limited to process the concept of your question, searching this concept in the web, comparing several pages with it to create an summary. It is a very different approach for an AI as an chat, because of this, yes, they also can give BS as answer, depending of the pages they consult for it, same as when you search something in the web in terraplanist pages, but this is with search AIs less an problem as with ChatBots.

    AI is an tool and we have to use it as such, to help us in researches and tasks, not to substitute our own intelligence and creativity, which is the real problem nowadays. For Example, I have in Lemmy several posts in World News, Science and Tecnology from articles and science papers I found in the web, mostly with long texts. Because of this I post it also with an summary made by Andisearch, which is always pretty correct with added several different sources of the issue, so you can check the content. The other why I like Andisearch is, when it don’t find an answer, it don’t invent one, it simply offers an normal websearch by yourself, using an search API from DDG and other privacy search engines.

    Anyway, the use of AI for researches always need an fact check, before we use the content, the only error is to use the answers as is or use biased AI from big (US) corporations. In almost 8.000 different AI apps and services which currently exist, special for very different tasks, we can’t globalise these because of the BS by ChatBots from Google, M$, METH, Amazon & cia, only blame the lack of the own common sense like a kid with a new toy, the differences are too big.



  • Generally hallucinations are frequent in pure chatbots, ChatGPT and similar, because they are based on an own knowledge base and LLM, so, if they don’t know an answer, they invent it, based on their data set. Different are AI with web access, they don’t have an own knowledge base, retrieving their answers in realtime from webcontents, because of this with a similar reliability as traditional search engines, with the advantage that they find relevant sites which are related with the context of the question, listing sources and summarizing the contents in a direct answer, instead of 390.000 pages of sites, which have nothing to do with the question in the traditional keyword search. IMHO for me, the only AI apps which result usefull for normal users, as search assistant, not an chatbot which tell me BS.




  • Not 1000 years ago, KHTML is still used by Konqueror, last release 25.08.2 2025-10-09 (Linux only). But yes, it got very marginal, some more development by KDE would be desirable to be an real alternative.

    https://apps.kde.org/konqueror/

    …WebKit started as a fork of the KHTML and KJS libraries from KDE, and has since been further developed by KDE contributors (KWebKit), Apple, Google, Nokia, Bitstream, BlackBerry, Sony, Igalia, and others. WebKit supports macOS, Windows, Linux, and various other Unix-like operating systems. On April 3, 2013, Google announced that it had forked WebCore, a component of WebKit, to be used in future versions of Google Chrome under the name Blink.

    Certainly Spain is pretty active in software developement (OpenSource and also proprietary), eg. Panda Security with the first cloud based AV which retrieved Malware definition in realtime from the cloud. Nowadays most other AV, even the Windows Defender, use this system.

    https://www.f6s.com/companies/software/spain/co






  • Yes, there are also creators which public their work without any financial interests, but the most which create contents with effort and quality, like cientific documentals, music and other artistic content have costs producing and publishing it. In Odysee they have an fair system to gain money, like also in Bandcamp, without nagging and annoying the user for it, like in YT. In PeerTube to do it the creators can only use third party services for it (Patreon or others), otherwise they can do only the same as YT, blocking the access to their instance as paid service.


  • For creators, wich want to monitize their content, PeerTube isn’t an option. The alternatives for music is Bandcamp and for all other Odysee, there they can create incomings with their content. PeerTube is nice for upload and host videos and same images in Pixelfed, both federated but only this.