I do believe that would insinuate a desire to perform sodomy in a domineering fashion, over said person.
Sodomy is of course inferred by the presumed gender of both individuals. There could of course be other penetrative sexual acts (as such is the strict connotation of the verb “fuck”, in this context), not necessarily sodomy, though barring other qualifiers, it is the default.
To perform a penetrative sexual act, it is assumed that the person making the statement has a member capable of performing said act. This may be organic or prosthetic, and some may who have an organic member may choose to use a prosthetic, or elect a champion as part of the original phrasing (I.e. “fuck (subject) with a donkey dick”). What is important, however, is that the speaker has some capability of performing the penetrative sexual activity prior to making the statement, or, at a minimum, a concept of a plan.
Also, to object to blowjob insinuations, but still say “fuck trump”… Like what the fuck do you think “fuck” means?
The word does not soely mean the act of sodomy anymore if that is what you mean
I do believe that would insinuate a desire to perform sodomy in a domineering fashion, over said person.
Sodomy is of course inferred by the presumed gender of both individuals. There could of course be other penetrative sexual acts (as such is the strict connotation of the verb “fuck”, in this context), not necessarily sodomy, though barring other qualifiers, it is the default.
To perform a penetrative sexual act, it is assumed that the person making the statement has a member capable of performing said act. This may be organic or prosthetic, and some may who have an organic member may choose to use a prosthetic, or elect a champion as part of the original phrasing (I.e. “fuck (subject) with a donkey dick”). What is important, however, is that the speaker has some capability of performing the penetrative sexual activity prior to making the statement, or, at a minimum, a concept of a plan.