Tariffs, component volatility, and Valve’s tolerance for losses all lead to uncertainty.

The title is a bit misleading, as the article lists diverging analysts’ opinions, ranging from Valve willing to sell at a loss or low margins, to high prices due to RAM and SSD price volatility.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blackeco.com/post/2330473

  • tal@lemmy.todayEnglish
    19·
    3 hours ago

    Valve willing to sell at a loss

    I don’t think that Valve will sell the Steam Machine at a loss.

    Closed-system console vendors often do, then jack up the prices of their games and make their money back as people buy games. So why not Valve?

    Two reasons.

    1. They sell an open system. If Valve sells a mini-PC below cost, then a number of people will just buy the thing and use it as a generic mini-PC, which doesn’t make them anything. A Nintendo Switch, in contrast, isn’t very appealing for anything than running games purchased from Nintendo.

    2. They don’t have a practical way to charge more for games for just Steam Machine users — their model is agnostic to what device you run a purchased game on. So even if they were going to do that, it’d force them to price games non-optimally for non-Steam-Machine users, charge more than would be ideal from Valve’s standpoint.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      2·
      2 hours ago

      Steam deck has customization you can buy with their points, I could see them getting some extra game sales that way

    • misk@piefed.socialEnglish
      33·
      2 hours ago

      Hah, this is where they get you and I’ve been dogpiled for raising this as an issue continuously. This is an illusion of an open system. Where are you going to buy games for Steam Machine? Steam obviously, there’s no competition. Then as your library grows you get more and more vendor locked. Then Valve does an Android application notarising switcheroo and you have Linux machine that’s no different from a Mac or an Android phone. Of course they can subsidise it because they can recoup it thanks to 30% cut and it’ll only accelerate the process.

      • PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        3·
        2 hours ago

        Theoretically people could use it for a cheap non-gaming PC, except the cheapest non-gaming PC would be non-gaming specs.

        Anyone using it for cheap crypto-mining is an idiot, the cheap option there is a rack full of bang-for-buck GPUs.

        Are there any other use-cases that involve gaming-PC specs? Making videos, perhaps?

        • realitista@lemmus.orgEnglish
          1·
          2 hours ago

          Could be good for some home automation workflows- plex server, transcribing security cam video, doing object detection on said video.