no banana@piefed.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoI promise I'm notmedia.piefed.worldexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1342arrow-down114
arrow-up1328arrow-down1external-linkI promise I'm notmedia.piefed.worldno banana@piefed.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squarewieson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·20 hours agotldr but unrealised gains is still wealth. It’s up to the tax law to define that.
minus-squareBeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 hours agothe reason they don’t consider unrealized gains is that they don’t want to pay refunds to people who buy losses.
tldr but unrealised gains is still wealth. It’s up to the tax law to define that.
the reason they don’t consider unrealized gains is that they don’t want to pay refunds to people who buy losses.