The project, developed in partnership with veteran free software developer Rob Savoye, aims to create a fully free and open mobile platform, from the firmware to the operating system.

  • Patariki@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I salute the early adopters who will suffer all the inconveniences of startups so the wider public can enjoy a non-corporate phone in the future. o7

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Oooh, I wonder if they’re going to pursue a free phone based on Risc-V. It’s a longshot but if they pull that off, it’d be like feeding two birds with one scone.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Why would anyone think that FSF is capable of releasing a unique and good device? It’s gonna be a bog-standard Android device with some software modified/removed.

    Might be ok for some people still though. Also I’ll be happy to be wrong about my cynicism.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      It’s gonna be a bog-standard Android device with some software modified/removed.

      Really? That would be heavily antithetical to everything they do. I expect it would be a Linux distro (like PostmarketOS) with some blobs removed etc.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Just because it’s a libre phone, doesn’t mean it’s necessarily a linux phone. Or at least any more so than Android is a linux phone because it uses a heavily modified (almost unrecognizable) linux kernel.

    There’s nothing in the article that says they’re just going to use a mainline linux kernel and throw a touch optimized version of some existing desktop on it (ubuntu touch, etc…)

    Heck, they could be meaning that they’re planning on making their own heavily modified kernel for their very own OS so as to skip all of the trouble that trying to make mainline linux into a handheld device has been so far. (similar to I believe how SailfishOS is doing it)

    • lemmyknow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Why couldn’t they just use usual Linux for that? Why a modified kernel? Is Linux as is not suitable for a phone?

      Can’t they just, idk, make a distro? Maybe from scratch? Pop!_OS is working on COSMIC. Can’t they have their Linux-based OS, perhaps with its own things as needed, such as a phone-optimised DE? Or whatever the phone equivalent of a DESKTOP environment would be. A Mobile Environment, perhaps

      If my laptop had touch screen with no other method of input built in, and were way smaller, could it not run Linux? Or is that different altogether?

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Linux mobile phones are the fusion power of the FOSS world, always right around the corner.

    All the pieces are there, but none of them work together smoothly enough to be functional for anybody except the most hardcore FOSS enthusiasts.

    When Proton started, it was kind of a joke, killed the Steam Machine idea in large part because the game compatibility was so limited. A decade later, we have a multi billion dollar handheld PC market lead by the Steam Deck, a Linux handheld that can play tens of thousands of Windows games without issue, in some cases with better performance than their native platform.

    So it’s certainly possible for things to completely change, but we need a big player or consortium of players to unite with a shared goal of getting a Linux Phone to the state where it’s genuinely able to replace a traditional Android or Apple phone.

    I’m very cautiously optimistic, I think it would come together much faster than Proton did for Linux gaming, but again, there needs to be a really heavy push into a singular device to start off. Like how the Steam Deck was, it allowed devs to have a singular platform to target for compatibility. Then, as the platform matures, competitors & innovators can enter the market and expand options, like how now there are multiple distros with builds for handhelds, like Bazzite, Nobara, and CachyOS.

    • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      At this point I would not be surprised if steam built on top of the deck idea and the support it already provides for fairly responsive and configurable inputs, touch screen included, to launch a steam phone or something.

      I mean deck isn’t all that far from having such a device. For the actual phone network stack they would likely just partner up with someone already in the space.

      They’ve already had to tackle powering a lightweight portable device with a touch screen and adapting the UX for a small screen and non-kbd input. They’ve already established they can source parts and mass produce a competively priced device.

      But realistically I can’t see it being that much better than the recent Linux phone offerings.

  • this@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My hopes and my expectations could not be more at odds with each other, and the only thing I know for sure is that one of them will be smashed.

  • pigup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I want a Linux phone so bad that I refuse to think about what it would be like because i’d be upset afterwards.

    • gfle@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I have an original PinePhone. The phone itself is horribly outdated and slow, but the software itself (Phosh+Gnome) is suprisingly okay. Given a good enough phone (as in hardware) I can see myself actually using it and not being annoyed more than I was with early Androids.

      Unfortunately what I understand is that FSFE doesn’t intend to do hardware, only software platform, so I wonder whether they’ll come up with anything interesting.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I can’t find any links to the project itself, only to announcements about the project. Anybody have anything more concrete? How far along is this project?

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Please god, help me find my keys! Tell St. Anthony I need my keys!

    Also could you make this Foss phone be real and reasonably priced below the cost of a gaming PC?

  • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’d rather see a stable OS and ecosystem for good, Free apps that we can flash onto existing devices. I’m quite happy with my Fairphone (repairable! modular! ethical!) and we know that building and marketing a device is painfully expensive.

    Let’s make Debian or Arch just work on most phones instead of trying to compete in a saturated market.

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      43 minutes ago

      There isn’t much concrete information, but my guess is that OS/ecosystem is exactly what this project is, and that they are not talking about physical hardware. Specially considering that they are putting the emphasis on free software (not hardware) and they are involving a software developer. Making a phone’s hardware free would be an entirely different beast.

      In the afternoon, FSF executive director Zoë Kooyman announced an exciting new project: Librephone.

      Librephone is a new initiative by the FSF to bring full computing freedom to mobile computing environments. The LibrePhone Project is a partnership with Rob Savoye, a developer who has worked on free software (including the GNU toolchain) since the 1980s. “Since mobile phone computing is now so ubiquitous, we’re very excited about LibrePhone and think it has the potential to bring software freedom to many more users all over the world.”

      From the official FSF post about the event.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      How old is your oldest working fairphone? I’ve heard too many bad things about software atrophy to declare it a success yet.

      • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m using a Fairphone 4, which is 4 years old at this point (October 2021) and I’m still quite happy with it, but I owned the Fairphone 1 and 2 as well.

        In terms of software atrophy, they do offer support for your device for 5 years, which is better than most, and because of its open nature, it’s generally well supported by alternatives like Lineage or Calyx, but yeah, I’m still on Android 13. While I still get regular security patches and haven’t really had a need for an upgrade, there’s no denying that the FP4 is behind.

        Of course, it’s also easily repairable, supports an SD card and replaceable battery, so that’s a tradeoff I’m happy with.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Do phone calls and RCS work 100% of the time? (I really hope the answer is “yes” because I really want to get out of the closed source ecosystem.)

          • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I’m afraid I have no idea what an RCS is, but maybe that’s a network/region specific thing? I’m in the UK using GiffGaff (O₂) and the phone, SMS, and data works exactly as well as everyone else’s… which is to say perfectly in most places and sporadically on the train due to the dead zones on the route.

    • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Let’s make Debian or Arch just work

      Wonder why that’s extremely rare on ARM devices, especially those with modems, and rarely works beyond proof of concepts on some very specific devices? Its not like you’re the first to have this idea.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Let’s make Debian or Arch just work on most phones

      You have no idea how any of it works, do you?

      Fighting closed source drivers, blobs, configurations, entitled users who want everything to work perfectly is not a child’s play. Having control over the whole device like this project is huge.