• Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The lion lacks a can opener.

    But the setting was a fight to death, therefore we have to assume that the lion actually wants to kill, not just eat.

    So the lion strikes once, and the knight goes down immediately from the blow. Then it’s over because of the immobility caused by the full armor.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            It’s worth mentioning there’s different kinds of full plate armour, too. It’s going to be harder to move around in something designed for mounted jousting, with hard impacts and strict rules, than something made for actual infantry use. That being said, you can obviously jump up on a horse even in jousting armour, and this is an actual knight who we can assume is in excellent physical condition and has a lifetime of practice.

    • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Contrary to popular belief, a set of full plate does not slow you down or limit your mobility at all. If it did it would not have been so widely adopted.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It’s a reasonable assumption but there was a… French? king who survived a battlefield gut wound because the knife stuck in his stomach to the hilt didn’t make it through the fat.

            Knights were nobility by definition, and it was precisely as plate became a reality that conditioning standards were dropping.

            Of course they also brings up that what a “knights full armor” is varies widely by time and place