Gmail prompt to provide phone number sounds like a threat

  • The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are you talking about? Google is not encrypting their emails, where did you get that info from?

    • nbailey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, this has nothing to do with encryption, it’s because they refuse to have a support division that would be able to get people back into their accounts.

      • stratoscaster@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What? No, that’s the whole point of 2FA. There is literally no other way to verify authorization otherwise because it’s by-default incapable of verifying identity.

        Knowing the previous password doesn’t help because those are often found in password dumps.

        This is true of any email service.

        • Madlaine@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          2FA is just a second password and has nothing to do with encryption. Can simply be removed.

          They could bypass this authentication without problems, if they want. I lost my phone and my google business account got restored regardless of 2FA. It’s just a button for the support. The problem is the identification, especially of private customers (dunno if they would even do that).

          Encryption passwords aren’t time-based either, they must be static.

        • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes but that has nothing to do with the data being encrypted and Google not having access to it. Their whole business runs around them having too much access to user data.

          And yeah before you say anything, yeah the data is probably encrypted at rest which means nothing in this case.