I feel like I have a deep reliance on society and technology, because I can’t fucking see without glasses and I’m too scared to do Lasik lol (also expensive).

  • BeBopALouie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    One would think that if most of society is toast there will be a shitload of left over glasses that could be collected and then distributed to those in need.

  • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I know of a YouTuber called the blind homesteader. He has family and friends help him. They have quite the homestead and he often helps the community around his homestead too.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    https://www.engineeringforchange.org/solutions/product/adspecs/

    Hopefully if enough of these get distributed it won’t be so much of a problem except for people with astigmatism.

    https://www.epo.org/en/news-events/european-inventor-award/meet-the-finalists/joshua-silver

    Joshua Silver, a professor of physics at the University of Oxford, first had the idea to manufacture adjustable lenses for the poor, removing the need for expensive equipment and professionals, in May 1985 after he had created a variable focus lens out of curiosity.

    His invention allows wearers to adjust the glasses to their personal prescription without the assistance of a healthcare professional. They simply look at a reading chart and adjust the glasses until they can see the letters clearly.

    The glasses use durable but flexible plastic lenses, which have fluid sacs filled with silicone oil between them. These glasses can easily be adjusted by the wearer by simply adding or removing some of the oil in the sacs.

    The invention is not without its limitations, however. Currently, the principle only functions successfully with circular lenses, limiting the design opportunities. Additionally, the principle can only alter the magnification of objects, so the glasses cannot treat those with astigmatism. What these spectacles lack in aesthetics, however, they make up for in spades with utility and work on non-round lenses is already underway.

    His stated goal was to make the overall cost of a pair of glasses as low as $19.

  • Lag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    19 hours ago

    People who wear glasses are screwed but not as screwed as people who rely on medication.

      • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I dunno, reading through common ADHD traits sometimes sounds like a description of the perfect post-apoc survivor lol

        • Sergio@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I always imagined that ADHD was just our minds tuned to being hunter-gatherer survivors, and thus not suited for a sedentary office environment.

    • WoolyNelson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I have trained my children from a young age that, in case of zombie outbreak or alien invasion, I am to be left behind. I require far too many medications to function in a post-apocalyptic setting.

    • Reyali@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      My partner and I have discussed our wildly different willingness to try to survive in a post-apocalyptic world plenty of times over the years. He would work to survive and would probably thrive more than the average survivor. Me? I’ve always said I’ll likely head to the cough syrup section of the pharmacy.

      This conversation came up earlier today, in fact. Well, I was recently diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. I’m still sorting out the right medication to get it under control and am dealing with a lot of pain, but way less than before starting treatment. I told him with this diagnosis, if society ever collapses in a way that causes me to be unable to get my medication? I’m out.

      • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’m on the same page. I’ve spent most of my adult life testing the limits of my skills, wit, and badassery. My conclusion from that is that I am not a badass and have no interest in trying to survive societal collapse.

      • 5in1k@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I want to see a movie like The Road but it’s kids dragging their parent in an iron lung down the road.

  • Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Your screwedness depends on how bad your eyesight is. Can you see well enough to tell a weed apart from the crop you’re growing when looking at arms length? Then that’s all the eyesight you need to be useful to a community

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Pretty much this. Even if your eyes are bad-bad, generally you can find a task you can do, even if it’s “go spread fertilizer on the crop beds over here” or “hold this metal down at this end while I hammer the other end into shape.” People with bad eyesight have historically survived in conditions nearly identical to what a commune of survivors would be facing if the T-virus decided to escape tomorrow or whatever, it’s not magic. Depending on the community you wind up with, you will have SOMETHING that you can do to meaningfully contribute even without eyeglasses.

      • pohart@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I believe that our eyesight is worse than it’s been historically. Sunlight shows eye growth and we get less of it today than 1000 years ago.

        It didn’t really change the point we can be mostly somewhat valuable, but there may be more if it’s with worse eyesight today.

  • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Not that useful in scenarios besides reading: if you curl your hands in front of your eye and leave a very tiny opening you can create a pinhole that’ll make a tiny bit of your view in focus

    Photo from Minute Physics demonstrating what you need to do for that:

    https://youtu.be/OydqR_7_DjI

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I do much the same, make a tube out of my hands like I’m using a monocular. Works!

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Neat! I have really strong vision, but know how to force them out of focus. It’s weird not being able to blur my vision when I’m doing this.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    18 hours ago

    We could rely on scavenging what’s already been made. Even if it isn’t your exact prescription, a little might be better then nothing.

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It took centuries to get to disposable contact lenses while trying to figure out the physics, both in optics and in manufacturing any sort of spectacles, at the same time.

    Will the survivors of the apocalypse be able to pick up where we left off or will they essentially start from scratch? That depends on the apocalypse and on the survivors. Do documents and knowledge survive, perhaps in a stash or in digital form? Do the survivors include an optician or a material engineer? Chances look good if that’s the case. If no, life will get a lot harder for many people.

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Restarting production chains and manufacturing facilities is going to be the biggest bottle neck.

      If we imagine something like climate change wiping out 99% of the population, there just aren’t enough people to do all that. It’s going to be all hands on deck just to produce enough food for everyone. It will take a few centuries of rebuilding to get to that point.

        • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          That is also true, but low output production doesn’t get the benefits of economies of scale. That means that the number of people we need per amount of stuff produced will be higher if we do things small scale. If we have a city of a million people, you can totally arrange various things in a more centralized way, which brings the benefits of large scale production.

          Ever wondered why waste water purification or energy production tends to favor large scale facilities? Same applies to farming wheat, grinding it to flour and baking bread.

          If you have only small towns, everyone will just focus on making the basic necessities happen. Who has the time to design new electric motors, when you need to spend your time milking your sheep and harvesting berries for next winter.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    18 hours ago

    You can make a rough magnifying lens by trial and error using glass and a hand grinder—not the same as prescription lenses, but for many it would be better than nothing.

      • LousyCornMuffins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        i feel like there’s some sort of childhood song about the dangers of silicosis we were supposed to learn but praise mandela didn’t

      • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Some glass is many sheets glued together, that could be trickier to work with

        Thick glass that’s not tempered will be the easiest to work with

        Pretty much any piece of glass and a series of sandpapers going from low to high grit will eventually work if you know what you’re doing

      • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yes, it’s not magic, it’s just the shape of the glass that makes the focus point of images be slightly closer or further apart.

      • EnsignWashout@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Can I find a broken window and start sanding it with sandpaper, as an extreme example?

        Yes, provided you have a way to polish it back to transparent again, after changing the shape.

        • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Ohhhh, cool. I knew it was glass, but I guess I did kind of think there was some magic going on in there somewhere. Way simpler than I realized.

  • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If you have or can scavenge a laser pointer, just go hog wild shining it all around in your eyes. You have nothing to lose trying it at that point and maybe you get lucky and give yourself DIY lasik.

  • Railison@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    For myopia, only an issue for a couple of generations. If we’re living off the land again, myopia will stop being a thing as in the past.