For Haskell to land that low on the list tells me they either couldn’t find a good Haskell programmer and/or weren’t using GHC.

This is absolutely true. The women who actually prefer 7+ inches are rare, and most explicitly seeking it haven’t actually experienced it. My girl prefers 5 or smaller because we can’t do the things she enjoys at my size.

The size you’re describing isn’t small enough to even make jokes about. Believe me, I’ve heard women joke about size and it’s the 2 inches or less while erect range; and even then it’s about bad hookups or guys that have been awful to them.
Girls that see random flaccid dick regularly are even less likely to joke about size.

More likely that she was smiling because now she knows you know her friend which means you have a shared outside connection.

The size you describe isn’t small enough to merit being called small. It’s barely below the statistical mean.

What’s more is that waxers are well aware that growers exist, and (at least in my area) that’s mostly what they see. It wouldn’t even be cause for comment. The kinds of things they even bother telling each other about are like people who want fancy patterns waxed, or who have awful smelling active infections and have to be told to go get treated and come back. Occasionally they might talk about big tough guys who end up weeping like a baby (not just tears in the eyes, but bawling), or when they personally make mistakes.

At most your aesthetician told her that you got waxed and how she found out there was a connection. If your coworker bothered asking about your size she’d have gotten the usual response of, “who knows? You can never really tell during waxing because pain and fear of pain shrink things.”

Source: was married to an aesthetician for 10 years.

Big same on the acts of selflessness. Especially over the last few years…

I’m exactly like you’re describing and a little older than you (44). Songs, TV shows, movies, animated series. It’s a trivial feat to make me tear up at pretty much anything someone might consider touching.

I suppose it’s outside of the statistical norm for our demographic, but I wouldn’t say there’s anything wrong with it. We feel things and we express those feelings when we have them. I’d argue it’s a lot healthier than what the statistical mean of our cohort does.

There are good reasons to hide what’s going on inside. Some are simply not prepared: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIKJ6n-vSKt/

Half of an ortholinear split keyboard and a trackball that’s missing the ball.

I looked into it a little using TinEye and the image predates generative AI images of this quality. I actually think it’s a photoshopped normal cat; possibly as part of that weird trend of making some small detail of a normal photo look freakish.

Princess Bubblegum taught me that this is how perfect cheese is made

A thought for why it may have been easier for you to regularly use your paper journal while not maintaining the digital journal: it may be a matter of visual cuing.

With the paper journal it sits somewhere that you’ll see it regularly, probably along your route to bed. Seeing the journal may have been your mental cue to write in it, as opposed to simple routine or habit. You don’t get the same kind of cue from a digital journal because even a set reminder is no different from the bevy of notifications your phone gives you throughout the day.

Something that could help you keep up with your digital journal is to start keeping a physical journal in the same place you kept your old one. Maybe put an NFC tag in it that just launches your digital journal when scanned/tapped. Then you’ll still have that visual cue and habit reaction force to keep you journaling.

This is the story I came to this thread for. Amazing! Thanks for posting!

A thought: any ai-image detector is a defacto trainer for ai-image generators. It necessarily becomes a kind of arms race in the same way that spam generators test their payloads against spam filters.

I see a lot of concern in this thread that future TVs would just peer-to-peer or cellular connect to do their dastardly functions. Wouldn’t this be preventable by putting a fine wire mesh around the box on the rear of the panel? Sure, the signal could still go out through the panel, but that’s bound to incur a lot of interference from the panel itself, right?

Thank you for reposting it! I’ve been looking for resources like these.

Those were progressive Republicans. The party Lincoln started was progressive at the time.

The current Republican party is conservative, but that wasn’t always the case.

Cool beans, man

It doesn’t take a “nucular” scientist to pronounce “foilage”! – Marge Simpson

Memmy has a broken implementation of instance filtering that currently needs to be configured on every startup, but it exists. Hopefully it will eventually be meaningfully functional. Precisely for the instance you mentioned.