Instead of just bringing a laptop, now your forced to bring a laptop and a USB-C Hub.
Instead of just bringing a laptop, now your forced to bring a laptop and a USB-C Hub.
Train a model on nothing but drama,
(Just about all written text is drama, otherwise it wouldn’t be written down, whether it’s internet comments or stories)
Your output will always be drama.
Ridiculous on their part.
With crypto going more and more mainstream, it won’t be long before another payment system shows up and starts competing against Visa/MC and Paypal.
They are opening up a lane for a competitor to fill a fairly large gap.
Yeah, the original was way more entertaining, agreed.
But the original didn’t really touch on the Ghost in the Machine-esque nature of blurring that line between man/machine.
Also the premise that they did it just to have a ‘mobile tank’ on the streets of Chicago was meh…
The premise of the newer movie, where they had to have a hybrid person in to push the narrative to achieve public opinion/support to allow robotic drones to roam the streets so they can make that sweet military industrial complex money and keep the plebs in place?
Yeah… way more believable, if not a direct prediction of exactly what is to come.
Robocop 2014
I think its extremely underrated.
I thoroughly enjoyed it, because out of all the sci-fi movies I’ve seen in the last two decades, this one has a very high likely chance of playing out exactly as indicated in the film.
We will blur the line between man and machine, and eventually have a identity crisis.
We will very likely see autonomous drone platoons being coordinated by a few or single human operator.
Those drones will likely be deployed in a military fashion first with push-back on deploying on home soil as a police force.
Until they will inevitably be deployed and used against civilians.
Also kudo’s to the scene where he is stripped down to the bare parts, and the entire theater went quiet. There’s a level of existential dread, when your ‘being’ is laid bare that the reality is… you… everything about you… is just a small clump of grey matter.
It doesn’t need to be a ‘protected class’.
If you were hired as an accountant, and job description explains what the job entails.
The boss can’t tell you to go out front and mow the grass, and fire you if you refuse.
It’s not in your job description.
Same with remote work. If the job description said 100% remote work.
It would be the same as hiring someone in one city, and then demanding they move to another city, and firing you if you refuse.
Sure, they can let you go, but they’d be on the hook for compensation. (in most civilized places anyway)
You don’t get a letter of employment offer?
I think you’re still kind of screwed if they want you in the office and you’re officially remote.
Depends on what you mean by ‘screwed’. If they hired you with certain expectations, like in writing job is ‘remote’, then you can refuse.
If they fire you as a result, yes, you are ‘screwed’ in the case of you’ve lost your job,
But you then sue for wrongful dismissal, in which case you have some recourse.
But if you live in a country/state that doesn’t allow you to do that, and offers no employee protections,
You were screwed from the beginning by accepting work in such a place to begin with.
If you accepted a remote job, you should have it in writing that the job is ‘remote’ work.
If your job wasn’t remote initially, but assumed it would be remote going forward, you should have demanded that the job has changed to ‘remote’ in writing.
If your job wasn’t initially remote, was temporarily made remote, and they are now changing back. Be prepared to walk.
Context? Who r these people?
Domokun
Interesting, I hadn’t heard this one. Proof?
You haven’t lived the Great Australian Dream?
Where would you rather be mate?
Unfortunately in the white collar world.
it was instead of my regular work,
‘regular work’ typically isn’t covered by someone else.
It piles up until you get to it.
deleted by creator
requests that Midjourney be made to pay up for the damage it has caused the two companies.
good luck proving and putting an accurate number to that perceived ‘damage’?
Was it Mario this time?