Lemmy account of [email protected]

  • 27 Posts
  • 626 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 7th, 2024

help-circle






  • I noticed that there are sometimes huge differences between models and providers. ChatGPT, which most people use, is a useless sycophant because it’s made to value user satisfaction higher than factual correctness (so it makes shit up und basically never pushes back if you challenge it). When using Mistral AI I had the AI tell me outright that I’m wrong (though it still generated very friendly text to do so, and it only properly does it when in “thinking” mode). No clue how Anthropic or Google do in this regard, just that ChatGPT is especially awful. In the end all models are risky.



  • <rant>

    especially from businesses

    if they want businesses to subscribe

    styled to attract the decision makers in their target market

    Do that, and it becomes a serious contender in the market

    The market who’s responsible for fucking up the internet? The market that constantly attacks websites with crawlers to steal everything for value extraction, which Anubis fights against? The market that couldn’t care less about you unless you provide value to it, and even then won’t give you a penny unless forced (while building the whole internet on your shoulders)? That market?

    Most FOSS devs I know who aren’t forced into it couldn’t give less of a fart about “the market” and capitalists with sticks in their rear ends inside it. The monetization was often just attached to a project because it makes sense given we’re all trapped in capitalism and perhaps have to somehow cover project costs (probably less so for Anubis), not because it’s a goal to attract investment.

    People who’re appaled by something so simple such as a .lol domain and a cute mascot sound awful to talk to anyway.

    It is a big problem with a number of opensource projects that could get wider adoption and support

    I tell you how that “support” looks like. Companies who adopted the software will add your maintainer Email to their business contacts. If there are issues with your software they’ll then usually ignore the developer route and directly write emails to you, and if it’s a big problem for them immediately blame you and threaten legal action, blahblahblah. They’ll treat you like someone they have a support contract with and be completely confused when you tell them to open an issue and that you otherwise don’t care. Meanwhile they’ll build an empire using your software and be a persistent nuisance.

    Why should anyone not desperately needing money to survive care about this.

    </rant>



  • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.detolinuxmemes@lemmy.world•Of course
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    16 days ago

    On the contrary, the trust into LibreOffice will increase.

    It’s with slop code like it’s with furniture. Sure IKEA can bury you in cheap stuff, but no one in hell would honestly claim they’re better than hand-made stuff. However other than with furniture, in the digital space there is no scarcity, you can copy one brilliant thing endlessly.

    We already have lots of good software and lots of people wanting to make good software. Nobody needs fucking AI slop code except those who want us to become dependent on their services to extract “value”.


  • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.detolinuxmemes@lemmy.world•Of course
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 days ago

    Depends. Hand-written apps will still be more valuable than slopped ones as they’re far more trustworthy and less generic (like, literally), not to mention people being environmentally conscious about their choices. A good, trustworthy app that respects the user (and therefore omits e.g. privacy invasion) is still worth a few bucks to many.