The Supreme Court ruled Biden’s student-loan forgiveness is illegal, meaning borrowers will resume payments without debt cancellation this year.

  • axlc@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    These two ideas you present aren’t mutually exclusive. Thinking that they are is limiting.

    Example: “Oh hey, yeah the current system is predatory and unfair. [Bam, loans forgiven.] Also, because of that injustice, we never want to put anyone into that position again [Bam, affordable higher education].” Do the rich get “more forgiveness” than the poor? Yeah, that’s not really a problem if 100% == 100%.

    I get that the rich people who pulled up the ladder after getting a cheap college education feel that loan forgiveness is cutting into their earning potential. But the needs of the rich do not and should not outweigh the needs of the many.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really don’t think it’s the rich that are driving a lot of the opposition to this. I’m originally from a very poor rural Missouri town where the vast majority of people don’t go to college. As you can imagine, they’re not huge fans of the idea of subsidizing loans for people who are statistically going to go on to make significantly more money than they are anyway.

    • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, because of that injustice, we never want to put anyone into that position again

      I have literally never seen anyone advocating for loan forgiveness advocating this. Ever. It’s not even on the radar.

      This is pure self-centered greed dressed up as “fairness”.