merde alors@sh.itjust.works to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 6 months agomull = problematic Firefox installation?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up159arrow-down116file-text
arrow-up143arrow-down1imagemull = problematic Firefox installation?sh.itjust.worksmerde alors@sh.itjust.works to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 6 months agomessage-square23fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down25·6 months agoThey sold their soul. I don’t trust them farther than I can throw a fully loaded 787. On that same note, fuck Google, fuck Apple, fuck Adobe, fuck LG, I can go on forever. Now keep down voting me, fuck those who do too. 🤣
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·6 months agoThey did? That’s news to me. Who did they sell it to? And what do you use instead? So help me God, if you say Brave
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoTo the devil (Google). No, I respect myself and you too much to say Brave. Mullvad and Libres Wolf. So, the fox while unfucked without a tail.
minus-squareefstajas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 months agoMozilla “sold their soul to Google”? What did I miss?
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·6 months agohttps://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/a-dangerous-conflict-of-interest-between-firefox-and-google/ Look at the finances part: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation That’s hooker behavior right there.
minus-squaretheshatterstone54@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoI agree with pretty much everything after “on that same note”, except I’m not familiar with LG. What did they do?
minus-squarecrusty@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoProblematic linear compressors maybe?
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 months agoProbably the privacy invasive TVs
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 months agoPrivacy invasive everything, forced arbitration, TOS bait and switch.,etc.
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 months agoOh, was it them that made the IoT washing machines with a nasty habit of unannounced port scans?
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoAs far as I know, Samsung and LG both do that. But I’m guessing every manufacturer that adds wifi connectivity does the same.
Why?
They sold their soul. I don’t trust them farther than I can throw a fully loaded 787. On that same note, fuck Google, fuck Apple, fuck Adobe, fuck LG, I can go on forever.
Now keep down voting me, fuck those who do too. 🤣
They did? That’s news to me. Who did they sell it to? And what do you use instead?
So help me God, if you say Brave
To the devil (Google).
No, I respect myself and you too much to say Brave. Mullvad and Libres Wolf. So, the fox while unfucked without a tail.
Mozilla “sold their soul to Google”? What did I miss?
https://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/a-dangerous-conflict-of-interest-between-firefox-and-google/
Look at the finances part: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation
That’s hooker behavior right there.
I agree with pretty much everything after “on that same note”, except I’m not familiar with LG. What did they do?
Problematic linear compressors maybe?
Probably the privacy invasive TVs
Privacy invasive everything, forced arbitration, TOS bait and switch.,etc.
Oh, was it them that made the IoT washing machines with a nasty habit of unannounced port scans?
As far as I know, Samsung and LG both do that. But I’m guessing every manufacturer that adds wifi connectivity does the same.