The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 years agoIt's so overlemmy.worldimagemessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down113
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageIt's so overlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 years agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-squareAnticorp@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoNow it’s making me identify developed pictures from a photo negative. I’m not quite sure what they’re going to do with that training since computers can already perform that task.
minus-squareTheOakTree@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoAlso the “select the image below containing the example image above.” Like… we already have computers that can recognize image repetitions.
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoSo that’s almost certainly trying to gather data to defeat data poisoning. The other image is probably slightly altered in a way you can’t detect.
minus-squarebitwolf@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoA common OCR tactic is to turn the image negative and bump the contrast to make text easier to recognize. It could be a precursor for that step.
Now it’s making me identify developed pictures from a photo negative. I’m not quite sure what they’re going to do with that training since computers can already perform that task.
Also the “select the image below containing the example image above.”
Like… we already have computers that can recognize image repetitions.
So that’s almost certainly trying to gather data to defeat data poisoning. The other image is probably slightly altered in a way you can’t detect.
A common OCR tactic is to turn the image negative and bump the contrast to make text easier to recognize.
It could be a precursor for that step.