irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months ago lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up1388arrow-down19
arrow-up1379arrow-down1image lemmy.dbzer0.comirelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square26linkfedilink
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down7·2 months agoHonestly a good use of it for once
minus-squareRothe@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·2 months agoNo, the media should not engage in undisclosed doctoring of photos like that. That is pretty heinous stuff. Either they shouldn’t have used the photo, or blurred him or some shit if they absolutely wanted him out of the photo. Just think in what other instances they do that to photos without disclosing it.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoYeah no. Judged as not trustworthy, that site. wlns.com was it?
minus-squaresem@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoIs there an anti-pulitzer for crimes against journalism? We could submit this for consideration
Honestly a good use of it for once
No, the media should not engage in undisclosed doctoring of photos like that. That is pretty heinous stuff.
Either they shouldn’t have used the photo, or blurred him or some shit if they absolutely wanted him out of the photo.
Just think in what other instances they do that to photos without disclosing it.
Yeah no. Judged as not trustworthy, that site.
wlns.com was it?
Is there an anti-pulitzer for crimes against journalism? We could submit this for consideration