• Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Considering the massive number of servers running Linux used in the industry, this sounds like a good way to kill the Tech Industry in California.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      This is a gift to Microsoft.

      This law only applies to computers used by children. The law explicitly defines “users” as minors. It does not apply to machines used solely/primarily by adults. It does not apply to servers, or other machines with no local users. It won’t affect the tech industry directly.

      This law effectively prohibits your children from (legally) using anything but Microsoft/Google products until they are 18.

      With this law, Linux cannot be installed on a school computer. With a FOSS OS, the local systems administrator would be considered the OS provider, and would be liable under this idiot law.

  • Kaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    29 minutes ago

    Saw someone say this on the last article I saw regarding this, but:

    What’s stopping the OSes from just putting “Not for use in California” on their product/website? Seems like a simple and easy fix lol.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I was born in January 1st 1970, more credible and symbolic.

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Shockingly, 2000-01-01 suffices.

      Or to put it more bone crumblingly:
      There’s no need to go back into the last millennium.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Holy shit.

      Are we twins? I, too, was born on the first day of January in the year 1901!

  • Fokeu@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Luckily this dogshit is completely unenforceable. It doesn’t excuse the people who introduced this law, of course.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      It’s hard enough trying to get Linux adoption in schools and businesses. This law makes it an additional liability.

      Administrators of FOSS systems will be considered OS Providers under this law, and will be liable at $2000 to $7500 for every child they expose to a non-compliant OS.

      Those few schools that have adopted Linux will be forced to switch to M$ and Google products.

    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      This is just another charge to add when someone is accused of a crime involving computers. It doesn’t have to be a computer related crime but just be part of their property.

  • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age

    That part is good at least. It also makes the California law an exercise in wasting everyone’s time and money.

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Time for US-based linux distros to move their servers elsewhere (if they haven’t already).

  • banshee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Age verification is stupid. I wonder if anyone thought of using a captcha. Require users to solve an appropriately complex problem before they use systems that require a certain amount of intelligence.

    Would be fun to embed empathy quizzes for access to social media 😄

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Age verification is stupid, but it’s also not the goal.

      Nearly all of the “think of the children” is really just subtext for “we want to be able to track literally everything you do”.