For streaming, cool. But for something like Cyberpunk? No thanks.
Would this work with a grapheneOS phone?
Devices with 8 elite chip are as expensive if not more than a mid-range gaming laptop/desktop it make 0 sense to buy one just for gaming, but I guess if you already have one lying around I think that pretty cool
Mhm! My old SD 870 phone has been great as a formerly retro or switch now modern pc indie game console thing with a telescopic controller
deleted by creator
But y tho
Why would you use an ARM/Android device to emulate x86/Linux instead of the opposite?
Basically outside of the steam deck all x86 devices are large and cost $1000. However, android gaming devices have a wide range of form factors (clamshell, dual screen, etc) ranging from $200-$800ish.
In my experience, support is nowhere near steam deck (maybe half, if that) and you aren’t going to be playing many 3D games, but it’s great for indie titles.
So if you’re looking for a smaller form factor to play indie games (including some older/lightweight 3D games) on the cheaper side, the android handhelds are an interesting option.
Basically outside of the steam deck
Then get a Steam Deck (when they’re back in stock). This thing is $600, which is more than a Steam Deck.
I agree this device may not be worth it, but as I said other arm devices with the same capability and different form factors cost anywhere from $200-800 and have their own pros and cons.
A $200 device does not have the same capabilities.
Okay, I should have said similar, but you seem to just not want to acknowledge that there is a space/demand for these kinds of products.
Show me a non arm $200 range product that can run games like mewgenics, deadcells, megabonk, etc. The closest I can think of is a Nintendo switch, but that has a more limited (and expensive) library and will start losing support as the more expensive switch 2 takes over.
I have no doubt that there’s demand for all kinds of stupid shit. The question is if it’s stupid, which this appears to be to me.
Show me a non arm $200 range product that can run games like mewgenics, deadcells, megabonk, etc.
There aren’t any $200 x86 handheld devices that I’m aware of, but that’s not what we’re discussing. This is a $600 device.
Battery life, Android ecosystem is actually designed for a smaller form factor, cost. Wither or not these are good enough reasons are personal, but there are reasons.
There’s really not much of an advantage in efficiency with ARM anymore, but there is a huge loss in peak performance.
Do you have any studies for that? From what I can tell phones and portable devices are all running ARM and even small laptops have been switching to ARM.
Not scientific ones,but they shouldn’t be necessary. Look up the Panther Lake battery tests.
There isn’t really any inherent part about ARM that is more power efficient that x86 can’t really achieve if they really want to. You’re not gonna find studies on this because it’s not really something you can make studies on about but you can read up on CPU architecture design, CISC vs RISC debates to see that the reason why ARM seems to be more power efficient is due to a bunch of other reasons. Chips and Cheese has a really good article on this but it gets very technical.
Could also look at AMD’s Z series CPUs and Intel’s Lunar Lake and upcoming Panther Lake processors.
Android ecosystem is actually designed for a smaller form factor, cost.
Android is Linux
Yes, but also no. It does use the Linux kernel, but userspace is very different. The application ecosystem is very different. There can be huge differences between distros let alone a linux distro and android…
Alpine Linux has a very different user space from GNU/Linux. It’s still Linux.
And also has nothing to do with Android.
sigh say the thing!
Anyone who says “Linux” means GNU/Linux and anyone who says Android means Android/Linux.
I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.
There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux!
Anyone who says “Linux” means GNU/Linux and anyone who says Android means Android/Linux.
What makes GNU/Linux? glibc! What about glibc is not optimized for “smaller form factor, cost”?
But y tho
Nvidia, Intel and AMD: their business now is circular money with AI and not PC gaming industry anymore.
Er, and you think ARM is somehow not involved?
What does AI have to do with this? It’s a Qualcomm chip, not made by any of those companies.
That’s their point.
Huh?
They are saying the fact that Qualcomm isn’t involved with AI stuff (at least not yet in a big way) is a reason to buy their stuff.
Nvidia, Intel and AMD: their business now is circular money with AI and not PC gaming industry anymore.
I don’t see how ARM, especially when Qualcomm is the only realistic option, is the solution here. Also, basic x86-64 patents have lapsed last year and newer extensions will lapse step by step. ARM64 is still so new, its initial patents will only lapse in 10 years.
Always complaints about battery/heat like the only thing people will try and play are AAA graphics champs. Hades isn’t hard to run. You can play the old Flatout games. Stardew Valley and Terreria with your cloud saves. There are tons of games coming out every year that looks like they could run on anything from a SNES to a PS Vita. Pretty much any game available on the Switch that is on Steam is super easy to run. Like the Ys games I’ve tried in Gamehub
On mobile Wuthering Waves, Zenless Zone Zero, Genshin Impact, etc are super popular. Warframe just released for mobile. Albion Online. People have some 5+ years outdated opinions mobile gaming
That’s fine and all but I’m sure most of us here just want to be able to bring our huge Steam library on the go.
